On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Dömötör Gulyás dognot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 June 2014 06:43, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
http://mikegerwitz.com/papers/git-horror-story
An interesting scenario, what is there to be learned from it for
fossil? Since fossil doesn't like history
An interesting scenario, what is there to be learned from it for
fossil? Since fossil doesn't like history rewrites, are we protected
to some degree from falsified commits? (I ask as I have not yed had
the opportunity to look into fossil's security features extensively)
On 1 June 2014 06:43, B
Thus said =?UTF-8?B?RMO2bcO2dMO2ciBHdWx5w6Fz?= on Sun, 01 Jun 2014 12:56:41
+0200:
An interesting scenario, what is there to be learned from it for
fossil? Since fossil doesn't like history rewrites, are we protected
to some degree from falsified commits?
With our without PGP
http://mikegerwitz.com/papers/git-horror-story
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
4 matches
Mail list logo