Re: [fossil-users] Makefile

2010-07-09 Thread Michael Richter
OK, this *really* is the last thing before bed. I've documented the new build system (somewhat) here: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/wiki?name=New+Build+Documentation On 10 July 2010 01:54, Michael Richter wrote: > Last thing before I go to bed, I've tagged the relevant check-ins > "newbuild"

Re: [fossil-users] Makefile

2010-07-09 Thread Michael Richter
Last thing before I go to bed, I've tagged the relevant check-ins "newbuild". On 10 July 2010 01:43, Michael Richter wrote: > Did I say tomorrow? I decided sleep is an optional and highly-artificial > construct. MingGW32 builds are tested, corrected and checked-in. > > http://fossil-scm.org/in

Re: [fossil-users] Makefile

2010-07-09 Thread Michael Richter
Did I say tomorrow? I decided sleep is an optional and highly-artificial construct. MingGW32 builds are tested, corrected and checked-in. http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?p=7496 On 10 July 2010 00:30, Michael Richter wrote: > I've checked in my first try at re-organizing the build fi

Re: [fossil-users] Makefile

2010-07-09 Thread Michael Richter
I've checked in my first try at re-organizing the build files. You can take a look at my changes at http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/d3252d7488 or by *fossil update ttmrichter* to switch over to my branch. Currently I've only tested Linux builds using both gcc and clang as the compiler. I h

Re: [fossil-users] Makefile

2010-07-09 Thread renework
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:07:52 +0200, Paul Ruizendaal wrote: > I can confirm the out-of-the-box windows build. I am using the make from > the UnxUtils package: > http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ > > Where I went wrong was not installing the sh.exe binary, which this build > of make relies on. So th

Re: [fossil-users] Makefile

2010-07-08 Thread Paul Ruizendaal
I can confirm the out-of-the-box windows build. I am using the make from the UnxUtils package: http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ Where I went wrong was not installing the sh.exe binary, which this build of make relies on. So the minimal environment to build fossil on windows seems to be: - mingw, w

Re: [fossil-users] Makefile

2010-07-07 Thread altufaltu
... and also for fossil from cmd. - Altu -Original Message- From: altufa...@mail.com To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Sent: Thu, Jul 8, 2010 8:45 am Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Makefile That's interesting... May I request you to share recipe to build ssh & git native fo

Re: [fossil-users] Makefile

2010-07-07 Thread altufaltu
That's interesting... May I request you to share recipe to build ssh & git native for Windows? - Altu -Original Message- From: Dan To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Sent: Thu, Jul 8, 2010 4:06 am Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Makefile Yep.. I build fossil in cmd.exe

Re: [fossil-users] Makefile

2010-07-07 Thread Dan
Yep.. I build fossil in cmd.exe on vista regularly.. I have also managed to get ssh,git,perl + many other non windows friendly packages to work "natively" I do have mingw+msys installed, but the biggest hassle was a lot of time getting the PATH environment right.. especially the order of the

Re: [fossil-users] Makefile

2010-07-07 Thread Ross Berteig
At 03:34 AM 7/7/2010, Paul Ruizendaal wrote: > Building on Windows itself with gcc-mingw >doesn't work for me (just mingw installed, not cygwin or msys). Building within an MSYS shell worked out of the box for me, once I obtained a suitable packagine of zlib (I used the GnuWin32 port). >I

Re: [fossil-users] Makefile

2010-07-07 Thread Michael Richter
I'm looking more at having separate included .mk files for platform-specific stuff as well as better support for compiling under Windows as you've noted. Ideally I'd like to have a decent selection of platforms including: - Linux - *BSD - Solaris - Windows I'd also like to explore making compiler

Re: [fossil-users] Makefile

2010-07-07 Thread Paul Ruizendaal
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:34:31 +0800, Michael Richter wrote: > I'd like to re-engineer the Makefile approach in fossil so that it's easier > to work out what needs to be put in place for any given platform. Is there > enough interest in this that it's worth doing the work in my private branch > for

[fossil-users] Makefile

2010-07-07 Thread Michael Richter
I'd like to re-engineer the Makefile approach in fossil so that it's easier to work out what needs to be put in place for any given platform. Is there enough interest in this that it's worth doing the work in my private branch for inspection? -- "Perhaps people don't believe this, but throughout

[fossil-users] Makefile instruction is not corret for opensolaris platform

2009-10-14 Thread T.J. Yang
http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/tktview?name=6981de95b6 have the lines messed up. So here is my posting again tjy...@600m:~/Fossil-076f7adff2# gdiff -u Makefile.orig Makefile.opensolaris --- Makefile.orig   2009-10-13 11:25:40.0 -0500 +++ Makefile.opensolaris    2009-10-13 23: