Re: [fossil-users] Minor new feature: comments whenclosing/re-opening

2013-08-15 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > The command could be enhanced to allow that; however, not everything that > is allowed in the file format is surfaced via the command line interface. > i can second that - > In theory, the manifest parser needs to be able to cope with al

Re: [fossil-users] Minor new feature: comments whenclosing/re-opening

2013-08-15 Thread Joe Mistachkin
Jan Nijtmans wrote: > > Should the "fossil tag cancel" command be allowed to > have ?VALUE? here as well? If YES, then the documentation > is correct and my commit should be reverted. If NO, then > fossil cannot generate such T-cards, and the documentation > should say so. > The command could

Re: [fossil-users] Minor new feature: comments whenclosing/re-opening

2013-08-15 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2013/8/15 Joe Mistachkin : > Jan Nijtmans wrote: >> Actually, I don't think that >> cancelling T-cards should be allowed to have a value. I checked the >> sqlite and fossil repositories: No T-cards like this exist currently. >> > > The file format documenation would seem to indicate otherwise: > >

Re: [fossil-users] Minor new feature: comments whenclosing/re-opening

2013-08-15 Thread Joe Mistachkin
Jan Nijtmans wrote: > > I don't see the comment you mention Actually, I don't think that > cancelling T-cards should be allowed to have a value. I checked the > sqlite and fossil repositories: No T-cards like this exist currently. > The file format documenation would seem to indicate otherw