Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-12 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > I can set up all kind of QoS on my firewall, but most devices don't > allow one to request random and routine packet loss and actual > connection resets (e.g. TCP/IP RST packets) as part of the QoS settings. > ;-) Just setu

Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-11 Thread Kelly Dean
Andy Bradford wrote: > I can set up all kind of QoS on my firewall, but most devices don't > allow one to request random and routine packet loss and actual > connection resets (e.g. TCP/IP RST packets) as part of the QoS settings. > ;-) Just hurl a few gratuitous insults at some bor

Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-11 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Mon, 12 Jan 2015 02:06:30 +0100: > Seems i can only set "high" and "low" priority, but some boxes may > allow more details setup. I can set up all kind of QoS on my firewall, but most devices don't allow one to request random and routine packet loss and

Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-11 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Kelly Dean on Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:37:12 +: > Just ask your ISP or network administrator to lower your quality of > service, or try using wifi while a large number of microwave ovens are > operating nearby. Wifi with a microwave would have been much easier than what I was doing! I

Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Kelly Dean wrote: > Just ask your ISP or network administrator to lower your quality of service Actually... some WLAN boxes let you change QoS settings. Mine lets me set up per-device/per-service rules for traffic priority. Seems i can only set "high" and "low"

Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-11 Thread Kelly Dean
Andy Bradford wrote: > This explanation seems to fit the facts, but > reproducing it is a pain. > > Let me see if I can cause what I've just stated above to happen. Just ask your ISP or network administrator to lower your quality of service, or try using wifi while a large number of microwave ov

Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-09 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Kelly Dean on Fri, 09 Jan 2015 08:39:35 +: > HTTPS can't prevent a proxy from dropping packets, including all > packets after a certain number of bytes for the connection. It also > doesn't prevent bogus reset packets, though a properly-designed secure > transport protocol (

Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-09 Thread Kelly Dean
Andy Bradford wrote: > were you presented with a certificate to accept No. > is it transparent or does Fossil know it's using a proxy? It's transparent. Firefox works fine through it (both HTTP and HTTPS), and ssh works fine through it. Except that it's slow and tends to drop packets and ra

Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-08 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Kelly Dean on Thu, 08 Jan 2015 08:52:28 +: > Yes, a badly-behaving one. That's why I said the network probably > dropped some packets. But I used HTTPS, so the problems the proxy > could have introduced would be no more than dropped packets, and bogus > TCP resets (which SS

Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-08 Thread Kelly Dean
Whoever kept trying and failing to download my fossil-src files using MSIE 8.0 an hour ago, and only got 153600 bytes each time... try a better browser. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-

Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-08 Thread Kelly Dean
Andy Bradford wrote: > Any chance you can use --httptrace when cloning with whatever is causing > this problem? --httptrace will leave behind a handful of .txt files > beginning with http- which have the requests and replies Fossil makes. Problem not reproducible at the moment. >> -rw-r--r--

Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Kelly Dean on Tue, 06 Jan 2015 21:03:03 +: > That's horrible. You have to re-download the entire repository if one > packet is lost at the end? If you're suggesting that Fossil should treat network errors differently during cloning and complete with whatever artifacts hav

Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-06 Thread Kelly Dean
Andy Bradford wrote: > If the connection times out > then I would expect the whole operation to fail and the repository be > deleted. That's horrible. You have to re-download the entire repository if one packet is lost at the end? > I'm curious what Fossil would do with one of the partial cl

Re: [fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Kelly Dean on Sun, 04 Jan 2015 04:21:55 +: > Yesterday, the network probably dropped some packets. But it's > misleading, at least for a new user, for Fossil to report that the > clone finished when it actually didn't. I have not been able to reproduce this problem. D

[fossil-users] Misleading report that clone finished

2015-01-05 Thread Kelly Dean
Yesterday I tried Fossil for the first time. Using 1.29: # fossil clone https://www.fossil-scm.org/ fossil-src.fossil Round-trips: 2 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 3073 Clone finished with 3113 bytes sent, 1850717 bytes received Rebuilding repository meta-data... 100.0% complete... project-id: a