Re: [fossil-users] Possible future "fossil rm" behaviour

2012-12-14 Thread Francis Daly
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 07:58:03PM +, Francis Daly wrote: Hi there, I forgot at least one case, which I can shoe-horn in here by adding: what would be different if "rm a" were added just before "fossil new-rm a", as in: > echo X >a; echo X >b; echo X >c; > fossil add a b > fossil commit -m

[fossil-users] Possible future "fossil rm" behaviour

2012-12-14 Thread Francis Daly
Hi there, there is another thread happening which is suggesting or proposing a future version of "fossil rm" which is not identical to the current one. What is the specific desired future behaviour? I think there are three possible future commands to be considered -- whether implemented as comma