Re: [fossil-users] Should distributed binary require libnss to connect over http?

2012-02-04 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:18:28PM +0100, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:11:03 +0100 Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 04:27:07AM +0100, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: Yeah, static linking is not actually that static nowadays. When linking, GCC warns about

Re: [fossil-users] Should distributed binary require libnss to connect over http?

2012-01-30 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:11:03 +0100 Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 04:27:07AM +0100, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:49:00 +0100 Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: I've hit a surprising obstacle. I've tried to use Fossil, the binary from the website,

[fossil-users] Should distributed binary require libnss to connect over http?

2012-01-29 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
Hi, I've hit a surprising obstacle. I've tried to use Fossil, the binary from the website, on a heavily stripped down Linux system. But trying to clone end with: fl: can't resolve host name: dev.lrem.net I traced the problem to be lack of libnss_dns.so.2. But as far as I understand, this

Re: [fossil-users] Should distributed binary require libnss to connect over http?

2012-01-29 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Jan 29, 2012, at 20:36 , Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: I've hit a surprising obstacle. I've tried to use Fossil, the binary from the website, on a heavily stripped down Linux system. But trying to clone end with: fl: can't resolve host name: dev.lrem.net I traced the problem to be

Re: [fossil-users] Should distributed binary require libnss to connect over http?

2012-01-29 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:49:00 +0100 Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: I've hit a surprising obstacle. I've tried to use Fossil, the binary from the website, on a heavily stripped down Linux system. But trying to clone end with: fl: can't resolve host name: dev.lrem.net I traced the