Re: [fossil-users] Strange timeline bug with dp parameter.

2015-07-14 Thread bch
In the meantime would it be feasible to "throw an error" briefly explaining the issue, and offering links both mutually exclusive dp= and r= displays ? -bch On 7/14/15, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 7/13/15, Andy Bradford wrote: >> Thus said Andy Goth on Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:34:11 -0500: >> >>> I f

Re: [fossil-users] Strange timeline bug with dp parameter.

2015-07-14 Thread Richard Hipp
On 7/13/15, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Andy Goth on Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:34:11 -0500: > >> I found the same bug and reported to the list. There were no replies. >> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg20593.html > > Yep, that's it. In fact, as I sent the email

Re: [fossil-users] Strange timeline bug with dp parameter.

2015-07-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:34:11 -0500: > I found the same bug and reported to the list. There were no replies. > > https://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg20593.html Yep, that's it. In fact, as I sent the email I remember having a nagging feeling of h

Re: [fossil-users] Strange timeline bug with dp parameter.

2015-07-13 Thread Andy Goth
On 7/11/2015 11:26 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Bisection reveals that the poor display was introduced into trunk via > [c0c0bae719eb96e6] and more specifically on the form-submenu branch at > [b17970e13bc314b4]. > > I may look at fixing it unless someone who is more familiar with the > tim

[fossil-users] Strange timeline bug with dp parameter.

2015-07-11 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, I was perusing the Fossil timeline from here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?n=50&y=all&v=0&c=2015-07-11 I then clicked on the link from edit [2821e284] and it took me here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?r=enhancedUndo-test&nd&dp=2821e284c5337529&unhide Wh