For those interested in a TH1 exec command, I took the ideas from Stephan
and Ron, and mixed a few of my own. Here I present my latest version for
the exec command I'm using. Now I directly call the functions already
included in src/popen.c
This time, it can take up to 3 parameters:
*exec
Here the current code (missing the capture of the stdout). I send it as a
patch to the current trunk version (0d1d7f6481).
Ideas?
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Abilio Marques abili...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think
Yeah, missed the attach...
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Abilio Marques abili...@gmail.com wrote:
Here the current code (missing the capture of the stdout). I send it as a
patch to the current trunk version (0d1d7f6481).
Ideas?
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Stephan Beal
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Abilio Marques abili...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, missed the attach...
src/popen.c does a lot of the same stuff except... it fails fatally on
error instead of returning TH_ERROR. Pedantically speaking, i prefer using
error codes (like your patch), but fossil has a
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Abilio Marques abili...@gmail.com wrote:
Here the current code (missing the capture of the stdout). I send it as a
patch to the current trunk version (0d1d7f6481).
Ideas?
I suggest altering the parameter processing to be:
if ( argc == 3 ){
if
Ohhh, I missed the attach in the first mail anyway, here it is:
http://abiliojr.homenet.org:20001/public/exec.diff
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Abilio Marques abili...@gmail.com wrote:
Here the current code
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Abilio Marques abili...@gmail.com wrote:
Here the current code (missing the capture of the stdout). I send it as a
patch to the current trunk version (0d1d7f6481).
The list strips (IIRC) attachments - try pasting it into your mail or
posting a link to it.
--
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Abilio Marques abili...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that adding the ability to capture the app stdout (and stderr)
would be a great thing. That way it could be even more powerful than git
hooks.
There is some code in fossil for capturing piped i/o, but i have no
Hi,
To make a long story short, I've always desired to run a script on a hook
feature. After a few times needing it, I decided to make a version of it
myself (I think some people had done this in the past).
I remember talking with someone about this feature (a few days ago I
thought it was with
9 matches
Mail list logo
