On 2012-07-07 13:04, Gary_Gabriel wrote:
Hi Stephan and List,
You posted some good ideas and took on the difficult job of
beginning
the development spec. The Münich event addressed some of the points
you consider below. As you remember the event occasionally split into
groups and Richard took
Hi Stephan and List,
You posted some good ideas and took on the difficult job of beginning
the development spec. The Münich event addressed some of the points you
consider below. As you remember the event occasionally split into groups
and Richard took the time to discuss and clarify a few of
Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> Could we all (or most of us) agree that TCL would be a reasonable
prerequisite
> for those wanting server-side scriptable/templatized custom pages? i.e.
would
> it be a bad idea for me to look at this option in more detail?
>
Speaking for myself, I completely agree (obv
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
> Additionally, it must be enabled at runtime by setting the "tcl" option for
> the repository to true.
>
Thanks, Joe.
Could we all (or most of us) agree that TCL would be a reasonable
prerequisite for those wanting server-side scriptable/tem
Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> If TH1 is not powerful enough for this case (i don't know if it is or
isn't,
> or if it is easy enough to extend), the next obvious choice would be the
TCL
> support (which is, AFAIK, still living in its own branch?).
>
It's in trunk; however, the compile-time define FOS
Hello, all,
Last night i started jotting down ideas about what a "custom page" feature
might look like, and found out very quickly that "the devil is in the
details."
There are several different approaches to consider, not necessarily
mutually exclusive:
1) The pages/commands are added via clien
6 matches
Mail list logo
