Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

Hi, 12-09-2013 14:41 tarihinde, Jan Nijtmans yazdı: 2013/9/11 Hakki Dogusan : I'm getting "fossil.exe is not a valid Win32 application" error in WinXP. I downloaded fossil.exe (yesterday, before it was replaced by the mingw OpenSSL-enabled build), and used the "depends" utility to have a look

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013/9/12 Jan Nijtmans : > I think this fully explains why fossil.exe compiled by > recent MSVC doesn't work on XP any more... > > Regards, >Jan Nijtmans More info: In Visual Studio 12 Update 1 it is possible to target Windows XP,

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013/9/11 Hakki Dogusan : > I'm getting "fossil.exe is not a valid Win32 application" error in WinXP. I downloaded fossil.exe (yesterday, before it was replaced by the mingw OpenSSL-enabled build), and used the "depends" utility to have a look at what symbols it uses from kernel32.dll. A subset of

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

Thank you, the tarball is OK. Heres is a report of my build attempt of fossil with SSL support with mingw32 and *openssl linked statically*. Some issues are probably not specific to this platform though and not new to this version neither. 1. OpenSSL is build with zlib but the test in auto.def do

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

Richard Hipp writes: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Martin Gagnon > wrote: > >> >> I notice from your Release+Build+How+To wiki, you build the OpenBSD >> release from devious free shell service. I also have an account on devious >> and I just notice they recently upgrade from OpenBSD 4.7 to

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

Stephan Beal writes: > Fossil's testing infrastructure is not as amazing as sqlite's. For each > release we (normally several of us) run through the following checklist: > > http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/test/release-checklist.wiki Can I just say, the inclusion of OpenBSD on tha

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:45:25 -0400: > Changed to a more generic "4.x". Updated version numbers for MacOS and > Linux in the same way. For OpenBSD it is probably best to just leave the version on which it was compiled. The libraries are not likely to be present unless so

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > > I notice from your Release+Build+How+To wiki, you build the OpenBSD > release from devious free shell service. I also have an account on devious > and I just notice they recently upgrade from OpenBSD 4.7 to 4.8. So I guess > we should chan

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

Versions of OpenBSD before 5.2 are obsolete and unsupported. On 12 September 2013 10:35, Martin Gagnon wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been >> uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.ht

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been > uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html > > I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things > were compiled the previous time. So p

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

[Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:03:58 -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: >Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been >uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html Thanks a ton, Richard! -- Groet, Cordialement, Pozdrawiam, Regards, Kees Nuyt

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

This version works ok. W dniu 2013-09-11 21:42, Richard Hipp pisze: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jarek Lewandowski mailto:maxja...@softleg.pl>> wrote: I have problem with https: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support I new windows binary with SSL support has been

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jarek Lewandowski wrote: > I have problem with https: > > HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support > I new windows binary with SSL support has been uploaded. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-use

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

I have problem with https: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On 11 September 2013 11:00, wrote: > This worked on Windows 2008 R2 64-bit, Windows 7 32-bit, Mountain Lion 10.8.4 > 64-bit. and Snow Leopard 10.6.8 (and it's i386 so should work everywhere) Well done! Thanks ../Dave ___ fossil-users mailing list f

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Windows platform. W dniu 2013-09-11 21:00, Jarek Lewandowski pisze: I have problem with https: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > Sorry, of course the change summary is on the web page. I think it would > be helpful to paste it into announcement emails. > See the bottom half of the download page link he sent: http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html -- - stephan

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > > From a quick browse of the timeline it looks like the ssh changes did not > make it in to this release. What needs to be done to make adding those > changes to the next release possible? > I'd like to start moving those changes into trunk

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Matt Welland wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been >> uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html >> >> I do this infrequently enough that I keep fo

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been > uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html > > I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things > were compiled the previous time. So pl

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

Hi, 11-09-2013 18:40 tarihinde, Hakki Dogusan yazdı: Hi, 11-09-2013 17:03 tarihinde, Richard Hipp yazdı: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html [snip] I'm getting "fossil.exe is not a valid Win32 application"

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

Hi, 11-09-2013 17:03 tarihinde, Richard Hipp yazdı: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:52:44AM -0500, djg...@gmail.com wrote: > I didn't know there was an official testing document, I just dropped the exe > in place and ran: fossil server file.fossil > > I mostly just use fossil for the wiki which it looked fine so just to clarify > I just glanced over t

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

I didn't know there was an official testing document, I just dropped the exe in place and ran: fossil server file.fossil I mostly just use fossil for the wiki which it looked fine so just to clarify I just glanced over the Wiki portion of Fossil and nothing else. Jonathan Otsuka On Sep 11, 2013

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Samuel Debionne < samuel.debio...@ujf-grenoble.fr> wrote: > The manifest and manifest.uuid is missing from the source tarball. > Thanks for the report. This should be fixed now. (Please let me know if you find otherwise.) I have also updated to release-build w

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

Thank you for this release. The manifest and manifest.uuid is missing from the source tarball. Samuel Le 11/09/2013 16:03, Richard Hipp a écrit : > Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been > uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html > > I do this infrequen

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:08:05AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > On 9/11/2013 08:59, John Long wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > >>Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4 > > > >So what? > > After the EOL date, XP will quickly start bit rotting

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On 11 September 2013 16:36, Michai Ramakers wrote: > On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> I started a wiki page >> (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing >> how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made >> for com

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

This worked on Windows 2008 R2 64-bit, Windows 7 32-bit, Mountain Lion 10.8.4 64-bit. Jonathan Otuska On Sep 11, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been > uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html > > I do this

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On 9/11/2013 08:36, Michai Ramakers wrote: For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform? I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform, occasionally. Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4 After that, no more security patches. I

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > On 9/11/2013 08:36, Michai Ramakers wrote: > >For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform? > >I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform, > >occasionally. There are plenty of people

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

2013/9/11 Richard Hipp : > I don't have a WinXP system to test on. But maybe some of the other > developers do WinXP should work fine, I tested fossil 1.25 or so on it. And as far as I know there are no fundamental differences in Windows API usage, so it still should work fine. (If not, you c

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On 9/11/2013 08:59, John Long wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4 So what? After the EOL date, XP will quickly start bit rotting. You can predict the near future by looking at the state of Windows 2000

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > slightly related question: is there, or will there be, a > regression-test suite for fossil? (I read about the sqlite testing > method, which is truly amazing.) > Fossil's testing infrastructure is not as amazing as sqlite's. For each rele

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp wrote: > Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been > uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html > > I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were > compiled the previous time. So please t

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

Maybe it is time to leave Windows? On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> >> Software can't go unmaintained indefinitely without consequences. > > > The primary consequence being that people eventually upgrade ;). > > > -- >

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Warren Young wrote: > Software can't go unmaintained indefinitely without consequences. > The primary consequence being that people eventually upgrade ;). -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > > For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform? > I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform, > occasionally. > I don't have a WinXP system to test on. But maybe some of the other devel

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27

On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp wrote: > > I started a wiki page > (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing > how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made > for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, ...

[fossil-users] Version 1.27

Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled binaries and let me know if you enc