Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Andy Bradford" on 07 Jul 2014 14:40:51 -0600: > I'm not sure that this is what is happening in this case. The > --httptrace output only showed 3 gimme cards requested and none of them > are on the SHUN list. Ok, apparently the --httptrace that was sent was not representat

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Donny Ward on Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:56:03 -0700: > His reponse in that link: > > > The pull and sync are requesting and receiving all SHUN records. I'm not sure that this is what is happening in this case. The --httptrace output only showed 3 gimme cards requested and none of

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-07 Thread B Harder
Good catch: you're correct. -bch On 7/7/14, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:10 PM, B Harder wrote: > >> Fossil insures that no remote user will ever be able to remove >> > > Shouldn't that be "ensures"? i always confuse the two. > > -- > - stephan beal > http://wanderinghors

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-07 Thread Stephan Beal
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:10 PM, B Harder wrote: > Fossil insures that no remote user will ever be able to remove > Shouldn't that be "ensures"? i always confuse the two. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny'

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-07 Thread B Harder
That looks to be the end of this mystery. For those wondering why do we request the same shun artifacts over and over and over and...: == The fact that the shunning list does not propagate is a security feature. If the shunning list propagated then a malicious user (or a bug in the fossil code

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-07 Thread Donny Ward
Richard Hipp wrote about this before: https://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users%40lists.fossil-scm.org/msg11761.html His reponse in that link: > The pull and sync are requesting and receiving all SHUN >records. You can >disable this using > > "fossil setting auto-shun off" On Sun, Jul 6

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said B Harder on Sun, 06 Jul 2014 14:40:58 -0700: > myhost$ fossil pull http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org --http-trace > Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 > Pull finished with 424 bytes sent, 612 bytes received It seems that I gave you the wrong option. Please try: fossil pull --h

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said B Harder on Sun, 06 Jul 2014 14:40:58 -0700: > myhost$ fossil pull > Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org > Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 > Pull finished with 442 bytes sent, 2645 bytes received > myhost$ fossil pull http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org --http-trace > Roun

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-06 Thread B Harder
myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 439 bytes sent, 2645 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org --http-trace Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Pull finished with 425 b

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-06 Thread Ron Wilson
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > Can't answer, but i see it only with 'pull', not with 'update'. > > [odroid@host:~/fossil/fossil]$ f pull > Pull from http://step...@fossil-scm.org/index.html > Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 > Pull finished with 453 bytes

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said B Harder on Sat, 05 Jul 2014 11:32:24 -0700: > What are the "artifacts received" below? Is these administrative, or > is there something else at play? That's interesting. I've seen this before with my clone of fossil and I've often wondered the same thing, but it doesn't app

Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-06 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 8:32 PM, B Harder wrote: > What are the "artifacts received" below? Is these administrative, or > is there something else at play? > > myhost$ fossil pull > Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org > Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 > Pull finished with 442 b

[fossil-users] artifacts received

2014-07-05 Thread B Harder
What are the "artifacts received" below? Is these administrative, or is there something else at play? myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 442 bytes sent, 2308 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull Pull from ht

Re: [fossil-users] Artifacts received: pull/sync vs. update

2013-05-10 Thread Marc Simpson
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Marc Simpson wrote: > >> The following output is a tad puzzling, >> >> --8<-- >> $ fossil pull >> Pull from http://www.fossil-scm.org/ >> Ro

Re: [fossil-users] Artifacts received: pull/sync vs. update

2013-05-10 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Marc Simpson wrote: > The following output is a tad puzzling, > > --8<-- > $ fossil pull > Pull from http://www.fossil-scm.org/ > Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 68 > Pull finished with

[fossil-users] Artifacts received: pull/sync vs. update

2013-05-10 Thread Marc Simpson
The following output is a tad puzzling, --8<-- $ fossil pull Pull from http://www.fossil-scm.org/ Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 68 Pull finished with 332 bytes sent, 4436 bytes received $ fossil sync Sync with http://