On 14 Jul 2011, Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Ben Summers wrote:
>
>>
>> If I run the ./configure script, Solaris make (which isn't GNU make) will
>> ignore GNUmakefile and build a broken binary again!
>>
>
> The maintainer of GNU Make, Paul Smith, writes (and i ag
On 14/07/2011, at 7:03 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Ben Summers wrote:
>
> If I run the ./configure script, Solaris make (which isn't GNU make) will
> ignore GNUmakefile and build a broken binary again!
>
> The maintainer of GNU Make, Paul Smith, writes (and i agr
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Ben Summers wrote:
>
> If I run the ./configure script, Solaris make (which isn't GNU make) will
> ignore GNUmakefile and build a broken binary again!
>
The maintainer of GNU Make, Paul Smith, writes (and i agree with him
wholeheartedly, after having spent many p
On 13 Jul 2011, Martin Gagnon wrote:
> There's no a big issue here.. it's just a kind of philosophical question.
>
> I've notice that autosetup "./configure" will create a GNUmakefile instead
> of a Makefile. In my OpenBSD system, bsd make doesn't use the GNUMake file
> when I type "make". So if
There's no a big issue here.. it's just a kind of philosophical question.
I've notice that autosetup "./configure" will create a GNUmakefile instead
of a Makefile. In my OpenBSD system, bsd make doesn't use the GNUMake file
when I type "make". So if I type:
# ./configure
# make
It will use t
5 matches
Mail list logo