On 20/02/2012, at 11:16 AM, Jan Danielsson wrote:
> On 02/20/12 01:24, Richard Hipp wrote:
> [---]
>>> The dynamic linking works, but unfortunately on these particular
>>> [Solaris]
>>> systems I want static linking. :)
>>
>> I agree that static linking is nice. Unfortunately, the Solaris deve
On 02/20/12 01:24, Richard Hipp wrote:
[---]
>>The dynamic linking works, but unfortunately on these particular
>> [Solaris]
>> systems I want static linking. :)
>
> I agree that static linking is nice. Unfortunately, the Solaris developers
> of Sun and now Oracle disagree.
[---]
It seems
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Jan Danielsson
wrote:
>
> > Can we address the dynamic configure/build issues, and then possibly
> > revisit static linking?
>
>The dynamic linking works, but unfortunately on these particular
> [Solaris]
> systems I want static linking. :)
>
I agree that sta
On 02/19/12 23:28, Steve Bennett wrote:
>> For the record (in case someone finds this via a web search): I think
>> there's something odd about the openssl detection. I had built openssl
>> without the "shared" option (so I only had the shared libraries). But
>
> Building without "shared" meant
On 19/02/2012, at 1:44 PM, Jan Danielsson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to get fossil to build using the auto-configurator
> on Solaris/sparc 9, and have encountered some minor bumps in the road.
>
> For the record (in case someone finds this via a web search): I think
> there's somet
Hello,
I've been trying to get fossil to build using the auto-configurator
on Solaris/sparc 9, and have encountered some minor bumps in the road.
For the record (in case someone finds this via a web search): I think
there's something odd about the openssl detection. I had built openssl
with
6 matches
Mail list logo
