Re: [fossil-users] bash: ./fossil: cannot execute binary file

2012-03-20 Thread Eduardo Tongson
If anyone needs a statically compiled x86_64 binary: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1830728 Mar 20 11:05 /usr/bin/fsl It was compiled with GCC 4.6.2 and Musl. Compile options: https://github.com/tongson/Gimokod/blob/7296c5b381994a06b0a13bd6445833f13426910c/core/fsl/PKGBUILD

Re: [fossil-users] bash: ./fossil: cannot execute binary file

2012-03-19 Thread Bill Burdick
Personally, I'm a HUGE fan of static linking for reasons like this! Really -- the fossil executable isn't very large, compared to git; statically linked fossil is 1/4 the size of dynamically linked git. Dynamically linked git even depends on more libraries than dynamically linked fossil. Here's

Re: [fossil-users] bash: ./fossil: cannot execute binary file

2012-03-18 Thread Richard Hipp
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Bob Chapman chapman...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW on Centos 4.9 or Ubuntu 10.04 LTS: $ unzip -v fossil-linux-x86-20120317175325.zip Archive: fossil-linux-x86-20120317175325.zip Length MethodSize CmprDateTime CRC-32 Name --

Re: [fossil-users] bash: ./fossil: cannot execute binary file

2012-03-18 Thread Bob Chapman
I uploaded a new binary.  Please try again. On Centos 4.9 [~]$ ./fossil version ./fossil: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by ./fossil) ./fossil: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by ./fossil) I can't try Ubuntu 10.04 until this afternoon.

Re: [fossil-users] bash: ./fossil: cannot execute binary file

2012-03-18 Thread Bob Chapman
I can't try Ubuntu 10.04 until this afternoon Just for completeness, the dynamically linked Fossil worked fine on Ubuntu 10.04 $ unzip -v fossil-linux-x86-20120317175325.zip Archive: fossil-linux-x86-20120317175325.zip Length MethodSize CmprDateTime CRC-32 Name