If anyone needs a statically compiled x86_64 binary:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1830728 Mar 20 11:05 /usr/bin/fsl
It was compiled with GCC 4.6.2 and Musl. Compile options:
https://github.com/tongson/Gimokod/blob/7296c5b381994a06b0a13bd6445833f13426910c/core/fsl/PKGBUILD
Personally, I'm a HUGE fan of static linking for reasons like this! Really
-- the fossil executable isn't very large, compared to git; statically
linked fossil is 1/4 the size of dynamically linked git. Dynamically
linked git even depends on more libraries than dynamically linked fossil.
Here's
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Bob Chapman chapman...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW on Centos 4.9 or Ubuntu 10.04 LTS:
$ unzip -v fossil-linux-x86-20120317175325.zip
Archive: fossil-linux-x86-20120317175325.zip
Length MethodSize CmprDateTime CRC-32 Name
--
I uploaded a new binary. Please try again.
On Centos 4.9
[~]$ ./fossil version
./fossil: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required
by ./fossil)
./fossil: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required
by ./fossil)
I can't try Ubuntu 10.04 until this afternoon.
I can't try Ubuntu 10.04 until this afternoon
Just for completeness, the dynamically linked Fossil worked fine
on Ubuntu 10.04
$ unzip -v fossil-linux-x86-20120317175325.zip
Archive: fossil-linux-x86-20120317175325.zip
Length MethodSize CmprDateTime CRC-32 Name
5 matches
Mail list logo