Re: [fossil-users] commits not seen on 2nd local worktree unless forcing initial commit

2014-07-27 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2014-07-27 23:45 GMT+02:00 Michai Ramakers: > and thanks for this fix as well - original test works fine here, now. Merged to trunk now. Thanks for your feedback! > I'll continue running this branch here until it's merged (although I > don't make new repos too often). And I'd be interested to do

Re: [fossil-users] commits not seen on 2nd local worktree unless forcing initial commit

2014-07-27 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 27 July 2014 22:58, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2014-07-22 11:35 GMT+02:00 Michai Ramakers : >> Hello, >> >> while toying around with Andy Bradford's fix/analysis, found something >> else, which seems related to the no-initial-commit feature which is >> recent default in trunk. > > This indeed looks

Re: [fossil-users] commits not seen on 2nd local worktree unless forcing initial commit

2014-07-27 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2014-07-22 11:35 GMT+02:00 Michai Ramakers : > Hello, > > while toying around with Andy Bradford's fix/analysis, found something > else, which seems related to the no-initial-commit feature which is > recent default in trunk. This indeed looks like a newly-found corner-case which doesn't behave as

Re: [fossil-users] commits not seen on 2nd local worktree unless forcing initial commit

2014-07-22 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > there, it became default again: > > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/8364065c45ec839d01e0a0535ebd754f81e9cac4 Ah, i missed that. > >> 00:00:00 [b58cc4d981] initial empty check-in (user: michai tags: trunk) > >> +++ no more data (

Re: [fossil-users] commits not seen on 2nd local worktree unless forcing initial commit

2014-07-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 22 July 2014 11:48, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Michai Ramakers > wrote: >> >> (FWIW, I know there have been flaws in this area before, and although >> I am not a dev having/willing to deal with them, I agree with Jan that > > AFAIR i reverted that to not be the def

Re: [fossil-users] commits not seen on 2nd local worktree unless forcing initial commit

2014-07-22 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > of course, forgot something: > > This is fossil version 1.30 [619fa857c9] 2014-07-19 19:20:25 UTC > > (i.e. trunk of this moment) > Good man :). FWIW, as a note to those who generally like to use "officially released versions" - the maj

Re: [fossil-users] commits not seen on 2nd local worktree unless forcing initial commit

2014-07-22 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > (FWIW, I know there have been flaws in this area before, and although > I am not a dev having/willing to deal with them, I agree with Jan that > AFAIR i reverted that to not be the default behaviour (IMO it should not be because it's a l

Re: [fossil-users] commits not seen on 2nd local worktree unless forcing initial commit

2014-07-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
On 22 July 2014 11:35, Michai Ramakers wrote: > > while toying around with Andy Bradford's fix/analysis, found something > else, which seems related to the no-initial-commit feature which is > recent default in trunk. > > ... of course, forgot something: This is fossil version 1.30 [619fa857c9]

[fossil-users] commits not seen on 2nd local worktree unless forcing initial commit

2014-07-22 Thread Michai Ramakers
Hello, while toying around with Andy Bradford's fix/analysis, found something else, which seems related to the no-initial-commit feature which is recent default in trunk. (FWIW, I know there have been flaws in this area before, and although I am not a dev having/willing to deal with them, I agree