On Oct 1, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Paul Ruizendaal wrote:
Perhaps it is bloat, but would it be useful if branches with the tag
'mistake' or perhaps 'hidden' were not shown on the default timeline in the
web interface, and having an option for showing the full timeline? It would
be a bit like the
There is something unsatisfying about the mistake solution, at least that is
my feeling. Conceptually, there is a difference between not deleting history
(which I think is a very valuable asset in fossil) and always showing full
history, rubbing mistakes in your face, especially when still
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Paul Ruizendaal p...@planet.nl wrote:
There is something unsatisfying about the mistake solution, at least that
is my feeling. Conceptually, there is a difference between not deleting
history (which I think is a very valuable asset in fossil) and always
showing
I'm sorry for this so n00b question but I'm not able to find this anywhere.
Is it possible to delete a branch? I've created a branch by mistake, in
this case I don't want to merge the branch, I'm looking for the git
equivalent -f (force delete)
Thanks,
Erlis
nope*. What many people do, including the SQLite Fossil repos, is simply
rename the branch as mistake, close the leaf, update back to trunk, and
start again.
See, for example, http://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline?r=mistake
Tomek
* - I think it would be somehow possible to get the artifact # and
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Tomek Kott tkott.s...@gmail.com wrote:
nope*. What many people do, including the SQLite Fossil repos, is simply
rename the branch as mistake, close the leaf, update back to trunk, and
start again.
See, for example,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Erlis Vidal er...@erlisvidal.com wrote:
Is it possible to delete a branch? I've created a branch by mistake, in
this case I don't want to merge the branch, I'm looking for the git
equivalent -f (force delete)
Hi all,
thanks for the answers, maybe I'm approaching fossil from the git side.
Maybe I have a misconception. In Git a branch is just a pointer to a given
commit, removing the branch won't remove any content, unless the branch is
not merged so I need to do the force thing but that's not the case.
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/branching.wiki
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Erlis Vidal er...@erlisvidal.com wrote:
Hi all,
thanks for the answers, maybe I'm approaching fossil from the git side.
Maybe I have a misconception. In Git a branch is just a pointer to a given
thanks!
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote:
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/branching.wiki
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Erlis Vidal er...@erlisvidal.com wrote:
Hi all,
thanks for the answers, maybe I'm approaching fossil from the
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Erlis Vidal er...@erlisvidal.com wrote:
My mistake was that I create a branch but forgot to check it out, and did a
couple of commits. Then I realized that the branch was there, but empty...
it was my bad.
In such a case you can use:
fossil commit -m '...'
I've been following fossil community just a couple of weeks ago and you guys
rocks! I really appreciate all your answers and the welcome I've
received...
Thanks once more for this amazing project
Erlis
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30,
12 matches
Mail list logo
