Re: [fossil-users] git rebase, and what it looks like in Fossil

2016-05-18 Thread Andy Goth
On 5/17/2016 12:54 PM, Ron W wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Andy Goth > wrote: >> So what would a Fossil analogue be? For simple cases, merge >> -baseline root:branch does the trick. >> >> But if the branch being merged also

Re: [fossil-users] git rebase, and what it looks like in Fossil

2016-05-17 Thread Ron W
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Andy Goth wrote: > > So what would a Fossil analogue be? For simple cases, merge -baseline > root:branch does the trick. > > But if the branch being merged also includes merges from other branches > for the purpose of updating its

[fossil-users] git rebase, and what it looks like in Fossil

2016-05-17 Thread Andy Goth
As discussed previously, for some people rebase is the killer feature that makes git worthwhile. Yet we don't have it in Fossil, not with that name anyway. I admit my understanding of rebase is very limited, never having used git. But I gather it distills a branch down to the changes actually