Re: [fossil-users] more on side-by-side diffs

2011-10-18 Thread Higham, Paul
t: Sunday, October 16, 2011 13:27 To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] more on side-by-side diffs On 10/16/11 21:34, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: >>> I'm still searching for better terminology than "1-pane" and >>> "2-pane"

Re: [fossil-users] more on side-by-side diffs

2011-10-16 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 10/16/11 21:34, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: >>> I'm still searching for better terminology than "1-pane" and >>> "2-pane" diffs. Any opinions? >>> >>> "Condensed" vs "Expanded"? >>> >>> "Terse" vs "Verbose"? >>> >> i like side-by-side, but i don't have a suggestion for 1-pane diffs. >> >> Mayb

Re: [fossil-users] more on side-by-side diffs

2011-10-16 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:10:58 +0200 Stephan Beal wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Jan Danielsson > wrote: > > > I'm still searching for better terminology than "1-pane" and > > "2-pane" diffs. Any opinions? > > > > "Condensed" vs "Expanded"? > > > > "Terse" vs "Verbose"? > > > i li

Re: [fossil-users] more on side-by-side diffs

2011-10-16 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Jan Danielsson wrote: > I'm still searching for better terminology than "1-pane" and "2-pane" > diffs. Any opinions? > > "Condensed" vs "Expanded"? > > "Terse" vs "Verbose"? > [stephan@cheyenne:~/cvs/fossil/whiki]$ diff --help | grep by-side -y --side-by

Re: [fossil-users] more on side-by-side diffs

2011-10-16 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 10/16/11 17:45, Martin Gagnon wrote: > I have a small proposition regarding diff page. I would like to have a link > on the diff page itself to switch between original diff mode and side by > side diff mode. > > I prefer most of the time side by side, but in some cases, it's more > readable i

Re: [fossil-users] more on side-by-side diffs

2011-10-16 Thread Martin Gagnon
I have a small proposition regarding diff page. I would like to have a link on the diff page itself to switch between original diff mode and side by side diff mode. I prefer most of the time side by side, but in some cases, it's more readable in original unified diff format. -- Martin G. _

Re: [fossil-users] more on side-by-side diffs

2011-10-16 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 10/16/11 12:20, Stephan Beal wrote: [---] > Despite the slightly awkward layout for the really wide area (it's not your > fault - just a side effect of being wide), i really like this. One tiny > hint: the background color of the diff area should probably be explicitly > set to white. Right now

Re: [fossil-users] more on side-by-side diffs

2011-10-16 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > >One thing to pay attention to is that the default skin does not wrap > >> long lines, while the built-in skin #4 does. Which one do you prefer? >> > > Have you got two version numbers which show this? i can't find any (the > vast majorit

Re: [fossil-users] more on side-by-side diffs

2011-10-16 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Jan Danielsson wrote: > I've done some more updates on the jan-sbsdiff branch. I'd like > people to test it out; view some different diffs and click around a > little. Do things make sense? > Hi, Jan! Despite the slightly awkward layout for the really wide area

[fossil-users] more on side-by-side diffs

2011-10-15 Thread Jan Danielsson
Hi, I've done some more updates on the jan-sbsdiff branch. I'd like people to test it out; view some different diffs and click around a little. Do things make sense? And, perhaps most importantly, play around with the style sheet to see what looks good and what doesn't. If you select the bu