On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Paul Ruizendaal p...@planet.nl wrote:
Hmmm…
If Fossil was created today, with the knowledge of today, would it still
have wiki pages? Would it make Fossil a simpler, but equally powerful tool
if it just had (web editable) embedded documentation?
Good
On Sep 16, 2011, at 9:39 PM, Paul Ruizendaal wrote:
Hmmm…
If Fossil was created today, with the knowledge of today, would it still have
wiki pages? Would it make Fossil a simpler, but equally powerful tool if it
just had (web editable) embedded documentation?
Embedded documentation is
Hi, all,
When adding new docs (for the up-coming json bits), which is the currently
preferred approach: wiki or embedded docs ?
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
___
fossil-users mailing list
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, all,
When adding new docs (for the up-coming json bits), which is the currently
preferred approach: wiki or embedded docs ?
I've grown to prefer embedded docs, since they are tied to specific versions
of the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi, all,
When adding new docs (for the up-coming json bits), which is the currently
preferred approach: wiki or embedded docs ?
I've grown to
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
In my own projects I've found this to be true also but then we sorely miss
the ability to make quick edits which is one of the best things about the
Wiki. Is it technically feasible to implement editing and checking in of
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
...checking in of controlled files from the web interface? It imagine it
would require
Just FYI: one of the goals of the JSON API is saving
7 matches
Mail list logo
