Re: [fossil-users] on sha1 as a hash

2016-10-20 Thread Martin Gagnon
> Le 20 oct. 2016 à 02:57, Luca Ferrari a écrit : > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Aldo Nicolas Bruno > wrote: >> Better question can be, how fossil manage collisions? > > Just a side note: according to v1.31 >

Re: [fossil-users] on sha1 as a hash

2016-10-20 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Aldo Nicolas Bruno wrote: > Better question can be, how fossil manage collisions? Just a side note: according to v1.31 the repository can now show its own collisions, as in

Re: [fossil-users] on sha1 as a hash

2016-10-19 Thread K. Fossil user
ot;.However, I think that THIS unmet need (sha options) are unmet needs that I do want as soon as possible, please ! Best Regards K. De : Scott Robison <sc...@casaderobison.com> À : Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> Envoyé le : Mercredi 19 octobre 2016

Re: [fossil-users] on sha1 as a hash

2016-10-19 Thread jungle Boogie
On 19 October 2016 at 14:19, jungle Boogie wrote: > That said, I see sha1.c comes from openBSD and netBSD. OpenBSD > revision on the sha1.c in fossil shows version 1.9 and openbsd's > version has been updated several times to 1.26: Meanwhile netbsd hasn't made any

Re: [fossil-users] on sha1 as a hash

2016-10-19 Thread jungle Boogie
On 19 October 2016 at 11:48, Scott Robison wrote: > Given that it is impossible to predict exactly how one will solve a given > problem (and thus what its hash would be) in advance, the speed of fossil's > default auto sync, the fact that no one has yet demonstrated an

Re: [fossil-users] on sha1 as a hash

2016-10-19 Thread Scott Robison
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:36 AM, Aldo Nicolas Bruno wrote: > Better question can be, how fossil manage collisions? > Fossil rejects new artifacts with matching hashes, working on the assumption that it already has the blob. The only way someone could hope to exploit this

Re: [fossil-users] on sha1 as a hash

2016-10-19 Thread Aldo Nicolas Bruno
On 19/10/2016 02:45, K. Fossil user wrote: > Hi, > > 1/ Does Fossil use SHA1 ? > Oo > Too bad if it is. > At least I expect that we've got a choice : sha256, sha512, etc. ... from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-1#Data_integrity Revision control

Re: [fossil-users] on sha1 as a hash

2016-10-18 Thread K. Fossil user
gt; À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Envoyé le : Mardi 18 octobre 2016 22h23 Objet : [fossil-users] on sha1 as a hash https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12737535 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.

[fossil-users] on sha1 as a hash

2016-10-18 Thread bch
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12737535 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users