Hi,
could you, please, implement built-in SSL support in fossil server? This
will make collaboration easier, since there will be no need to
configure/run a separate webserver...
Thank you,
ST
___
fossil-users mailing list
why not put it inside in order not to bother with 3rd party stuff?
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 15:01 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:05:17PM +0200, ST wrote:
Hi,
could you, please, implement built-in SSL support in fossil server? This
will make collaboration
On Nov 13, 2012, at 15:09 , ST wrote:
why not put it inside in order not to bother with 3rd party stuff?
To keep the core small?
Kind regards,
Remigiusz Modrzejewski
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
On 11/13/2012 03:12 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote:
On Nov 13, 2012, at 15:09 , ST wrote:
why not put it inside in order not to bother with 3rd party stuff?
To keep the core small?
Also, safer. TLS is a bag of vulnerabilities waiting for a chance* to
get out; better to keep it closed,
-Original Message-
From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org [mailto:fossil-users-
boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf Of Remigiusz Modrzejewski
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:12 AM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] server SSL support
[mailto:fossil-users-
boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf Of Remigiusz Modrzejewski
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:12 AM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] server SSL support
On Nov 13, 2012, at 15:09 , ST wrote:
why not put it inside in order not to bother
6 matches
Mail list logo