[fossil-users] status of TODO list (was Re: comparison with Git)

2012-10-13 Thread Gour
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:54:27 -0400 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: The goal of Fossil is to require fewer brain-cycles. Fossil isn't perfect. I'm sure there are things that can be done so that it requires less effort. But I believe it is better than monotone, bzr, or hg, and way better

Re: [fossil-users] status of TODO list (was Re: comparison with Git)

2012-10-13 Thread Richard Hipp
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: Now, I'm curious about some of the items from the TODO list (http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/wiki?name=To+Do+List) and their status: * Uncommit All what I need is simple mechanism to quickly 'fix' some wrong commits

Re: [fossil-users] status of TODO list (was Re: comparison with Git)

2012-10-13 Thread Richie Adler
Richard Hipp escribió: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net mailto:g...@atmarama.net wrote: Now, I'm curious about some of the items from the TODO list (http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/wiki?name=To+Do+List) and their status: * Uncommit All

Re: [fossil-users] status of TODO list (was Re: comparison with Git)

2012-10-13 Thread Mike Meyer
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:27:38 -0400 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: Now, I'm curious about some of the items from the TODO list (http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/wiki?name=To+Do+List) and their status: * Uncommit

Re: [fossil-users] status of TODO list (was Re: comparison with Git)

2012-10-13 Thread Kees Nuyt
[Default] On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:45:29 -0300, Richie Adler richiead...@gmail.com wrote: I like Richard's attitude of Fossil is there to scratch my own itches and it's doing fine like it is now. +1 I wouldn't like to have its CLI turned into a unmanageable monstrosity (at the very least) or

Re: [fossil-users] status of TODO list (was Re: comparison with Git)

2012-10-13 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 13 October 2012 16:45, Richie Adler richiead...@gmail.com wrote: Richard Hipp escribió: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net mailto:g...@atmarama.net wrote: Now, I'm curious about some of the items from the TODO list

Re: [fossil-users] status of TODO list (was Re: comparison with Git)

2012-10-13 Thread sky5walk
Hi, I too, am a very grateful Fossil user. However, I am both teased and puzzled by... New information is added but old information is never destroyed. (Ignore the whole shun mechanism for now...) I tend to agree with the philosophy of retaining working doodles and tinkerings of code. But, an

Re: [fossil-users] status of TODO list (was Re: comparison with Git)

2012-10-13 Thread Gour
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:05:00 -0500 Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote: Uncommit limited to the last commit, for the 'oops' commits where your fingers got ahead of your brains, or you realized seconds after making it that one of the globs included files you didn't commit, and so on. This is about