On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> Does the JSON interface work via the command line? It'd be a bummer for a
> user wanting to simply script fossil to have to run a server just to do
> some local scripting.
>
It can run in CLI or server modes, "mostly" identically. In CLI mod
Does the JSON interface work via the command line? It'd be a bummer for a user
wanting to simply script fossil to have to run a server just to do some local
scripting.
Jeremy
On Jan 8, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 12:36:58PM +0800, Michael Richter wrote:
>>
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 12:36:58PM +0800, Michael Richter wrote:
>
> And Ruby has no JSON tools? (Hint: yes it does.)
Thank you for your sarcasm. That's very helpful.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
foss
On 8 January 2012 10:41, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:45:55PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> > What were you hoping to do with a C- or Ruby-API, assuming one existed?
>
> Well . . . for my current purposes, a C API would give me an easy basis
> for building a Ruby API.
>
> A Ruby
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:45:55PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> What were you hoping to do with a C- or Ruby-API, assuming one existed?
Well . . . for my current purposes, a C API would give me an easy basis
for building a Ruby API.
A Ruby API would allow easier integration with some Ruby-based t
Ha, I barely have enough time with my own code. :(
Yes, no Stored Procedures, but that's still how I think of fossil and
SQLite together without diving under the hood. ;)
I should have said "SQLite db with lots of C procedures."
Thanks for the edification.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Stephan B
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:53 AM, wrote:
> Maybe I am being overly simplistic, but I think of fossil as a SQLite
> database that has stored procedures.
> Wouldn't it be easier to extend fossil's command set to SQLite's?
>
Yes, that's being over-simplistic :). sqlite3 doesn't support stored
proced
Maybe I am being overly simplistic, but I think of fossil as a SQLite
database that has stored procedures.
Wouldn't it be easier to extend fossil's command set to SQLite's?
I'm sure the "fossil ui" feature would be a winner in SQLite ;)
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Sat
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 06:50:22PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote:
> ...
>
> Search the archives for this group for many very long threads on this
> > topic. Management Summary: it can't be done without what amounts to a
> > complete rewrite, which
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 06:50:22PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 6:43 PM, wrote:
> >
> > I would love an API or fossil.dll.
>
> Search the archives for this group for many very long threads on this
> topic. Management Summary: it can't be done without what amounts to a
> com
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 17:20:03 -0500, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I have been reading about the JSON work, but I prefer not to go
that route.
I'm confused. What would a csv output version offer that the JSON
currently does not?
--
Michael Barrow
michael at barrow dot me
+1 (408) 782-4249
___
Yes, I have been reading about the JSON work, but I prefer not to go that route.
Personally, I want to automate only the steps I use for my projects.
Check in/Check out, Merge, Compare, Commit, Inspect Leaves, etc.
I have no desire to make a grandiose do everything GUI and I tire of
using/rememberi
What were you hoping to do with a C- or Ruby-API, assuming one existed?
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:52:51PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a C API for Fossil? I haven't fo
How about a SOAP or "REST" full api in the web interface?
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 6:43 PM, wrote:
> I would love an API or fossil.dll.
>
Search the archives for this group for many very long threads on this
topic. Management Summary: it can't be done without what amounts to a
complete rewrite, which would be a huge amount of work requiring a good
deal o
I would love an API or fossil.dll.
It's been mentioned many times that fossil.exe outputs are not
standardized and require text parsing to differentiate the results.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:52:51PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:52:51PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > Is there a C API for Fossil? I haven't found one yet. . . .
>
>
> There's no library-level API, no - it's a monolithic application. What is
> it you're trying/wanting to do
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> Is there a C API for Fossil? I haven't found one yet. . . .
There's no library-level API, no - it's a monolithic application. What is
it you're trying/wanting to do, and maybe we can suggest an approach?
--
- stephan beal
http://wande
18 matches
Mail list logo
