Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-06-09 Thread Tomek Kott
Hi folks, I just wanted to give a public shout-out to Ingo for his work on SharpFossil & WinFossil. Since they're the first (to my knowledge) attempts at fossil GUI control for Windows, they're very helpful in getting fossil to be widely known. I've been using WinFossil now for about two weeks in

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-10 Thread Timothy Brown
what switches Fossil takes as inputs. I just use Fossil for my Android app repositories so I am not a power Fossil user, by any stretch of the imagination. For right now it would add a newline at the end of every output "line". Tim ____________ Re: [fossil-us

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-10 Thread Ingo Koch
Am 10.05.2011 02:24, schrieb Jeff Slutter: > On 5/9/2011 8:15 PM, Matt Welland wrote: >> Rather than changing the terminal user interface (it will be slightly >> less nice IMHO due to the extra newline on a prompt) I suggest >> considering the approach used on the monotone project. A separate >> in

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-09 Thread Jeff Slutter
On 5/9/2011 8:15 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > Rather than changing the terminal user interface (it will be slightly > less nice IMHO due to the extra newline on a prompt) I suggest > considering the approach used on the monotone project. A separate > interface for automation. Make the human friendly i

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-09 Thread Matt Welland
Rather than changing the terminal user interface (it will be slightly less nice IMHO due to the extra newline on a prompt) I suggest considering the approach used on the monotone project. A separate interface for automation. Make the human friendly interface friendly to humans and make the automati

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-09 Thread Ingo Koch
> Ingo, > > This seems like a reasonable change to Fossil as long as adding it doesn't > break anything we don't understand (I can't believe it would). No, it won't break anything. The only difference is that on the commandline the users answer has to be entered on a new line and not on the same l

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-08 Thread Timothy Brown
Jeff, shrug, been a long time since I've done anything with a Mac, LOL. Ingo, This seems like a reasonable change to Fossil as long as adding it doesn't break anything we don't understand (I can't believe it would). Propose it as a change and get Richard Hipp's feedback. Maybe you should try

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-08 Thread Jeff Slutter
Actually, thinking about it, the '\n' probably just causes a flush. Therefore, the easier change may be just adding calls to fflush with stderr and stdout. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cg

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-08 Thread Jeff Slutter
On 5/8/2011 5:43 PM, Ingo Koch wrote: > >> CR/LF - very windows specific >> LF - is very common on other platforms (*nix) >> CR - Mac specific I think >> >> Without checking is it possible that you are receiving just the LF >> which you should be able to parse on with stdout output. If there is >>

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-08 Thread Ingo Koch
> CR/LF - very windows specific > LF - is very common on other platforms (*nix) > CR - Mac specific I think > > Without checking is it possible that you are receiving just the LF which you > should be able to parse on with stdout output. If there is no CR/LF,LF, or CR > then I think one of these

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-08 Thread Will Duquette
OS X uses LF, like any another Unix variant. CR was the old Mac OS. Will On May 8, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Timothy Brown wrote: > I like this and will try to support or help if possible. Both are good > ideas, a Windows explorer extension would be a natural extension of this. > > CR/LF - very win

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-08 Thread Ingo Koch
Am 08.05.2011 16:54, schrieb Jeff Slutter: >> I've included the zlib1.dll into the WinFossil.zip file. >> What do you mean by "I was unable to run the WinFossil binary"? >> I'm developing and using it on Win7 x64. Do you get any error message, >> exception >> or something like that? >> > The Fossi

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-08 Thread Timothy Brown
I like this and will try to support or help if possible. Both are good ideas, a Windows explorer extension would be a natural extension of this. CR/LF - very windows specific LF - is very common on other platforms (*nix) CR - Mac specific I think Without checking is it possible that you are re

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-08 Thread Jeff Slutter
> I've included the zlib1.dll into the WinFossil.zip file. > What do you mean by "I was unable to run the WinFossil binary"? > I'm developing and using it on Win7 x64. Do you get any error message, > exception > or something like that? > The Fossil.exe included in WinFossil.zip now works for me.

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-08 Thread Ingo Koch
>> For details and download see >> http://repository.mobile-developers.de/cgi-bin/ikoch/sharpfossil >> Please clone and play with it. Any response is welcome. > Great stuff, I'm definitely interested in something like this, I'll have > to take a look. Two things: > > 1) I was unable to run the Win

Re: [fossil-users] SharpFossil/WinFossil

2011-05-07 Thread Jeff Slutter
> For details and download see > http://repository.mobile-developers.de/cgi-bin/ikoch/sharpfossil > Please clone and play with it. Any response is welcome. Great stuff, I'm definitely interested in something like this, I'll have to take a look. Two things: 1) I was unable to run the WinFossil bi