Re: [fossil-users] minor fossil-website documentation issue

2014-03-14 Thread Michai Ramakers
thanks; this is indeed much clearer (anything indicating that the things are in question are generated by the user's own fossil would do, IMHO) Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bi

Re: [fossil-users] minor fossil-website documentation issue

2014-03-14 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:47 AM, j. van den hoff wrote: > sure, whatever, but I believe some sort of explicit statement that the > pages are generated by the internal fossil html server would help to avoid > misunderstandings. > i first thought that, too, but the wiki pages and embedded docs ar

Re: [fossil-users] minor fossil-website documentation issue

2014-03-14 Thread j. van den hoff
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:44:14 +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:43 AM, j. van den hoff wrote: "fossil-served html pages" 30 seconds too late ;). i like UI pages a bit better. i'm still opened to suggestions, though. sure, whatever, but I believe some sort of expl

Re: [fossil-users] minor fossil-website documentation issue

2014-03-14 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Arseniy Terekhin wrote: > > >> On the surface that change sounds easy to make, but after staring at it >> for 5 minutes i cannot seem to find a better/clearer alternative. "WWW >> pages" is just as ambiguous. >> >> Any suggestions? >> > >

Re: [fossil-users] minor fossil-website documentation issue

2014-03-14 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:43 AM, j. van den hoff wrote: > "fossil-served html pages" 30 seconds too late ;). i like UI pages a bit better. i'm still opened to suggestions, though. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But si

Re: [fossil-users] minor fossil-website documentation issue

2014-03-14 Thread j. van den hoff
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:40:38 +0100, Arseniy Terekhin wrote: On the surface that change sounds easy to make, but after staring at it for 5 minutes i cannot seem to find a better/clearer alternative. "WWW pages" is just as ambiguous. Any suggestions? "fossil-serv

Re: [fossil-users] minor fossil-website documentation issue

2014-03-14 Thread Arseniy Terekhin
> On the surface that change sounds easy to make, but after staring at it > for 5 minutes i cannot seem to find a better/clearer alternative. "WWW > pages" is just as ambiguous. > > Any suggestions? > "Available web ui pages" -- Best regards, Arseniy Terekhin

Re: [fossil-users] minor fossil-website documentation issue

2014-03-14 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > perhaps 'Available pages' on > https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/help would be better named > somethign else - for a user it's not clear 'pages' is seen in context > of CGI/html of fossil instead of, say, available doc-/wiki-pages of >