> The Download page advises that binary packages for Debian and Ubuntu are not
> ready yet and advises users who want them to use the RC2 debs.
The RC2 deb suck, the best thing to be using now is either the 1.2.0-3 debs
from Debian unstable, or the backport of them to lenny ( 1.2.0-3~bpo50+1 )
w
> -Original Message-
> From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-
> boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Donohoe, Mark
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 9:30 AM
> To: Mike Kinghan
> Cc: fossology@fossology.org
> Subject: Re: [FOSSology] 1.2 RC2 debs have broken dependencie
To add to it. It works well on 9.10 too.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Mark Donohoe wrote:
> Mike Kinghan wrote:
>
>> The Download page advises that binary packages for Debian and Ubuntu are
>> not ready yet and advises users who want them to use the RC2 debs. In case
>> it's not already know
Mike Kinghan wrote:
The Download page advises that binary packages for Debian and Ubuntu
are not ready yet and advises users who want them to use the RC2 debs.
In case it's not already known, one of these packages -
fossology-agents-single - won't install on Ubuntu 10.4. It has a
strict depend
The Download page advises that binary packages for Debian and Ubuntu are not
ready yet and advises users who want them to use the RC2 debs. In case it's
not already known, one of these packages - fossology-agents-single - won't
install on Ubuntu 10.4. It has a strict dependency on librpm 4.4 and Ub
5 matches
Mail list logo