Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology on RHEL5.3, Report #1 - Required RPMs

2009-02-16 Thread Bruno Cornec
Bruno Cornec said on Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:55:34AM +0100: So I've produced preliminary *non working* packages that I'll now test to see the install deps. Once the process is reliable (I pass my weekend adding the chroot feature to project-builder in order to support that) I'll give you a

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology on RHEL5.3, Report #1 - Required RPMs

2009-02-16 Thread Matt Taggart
In my build travel, I also found what seems to be a bug in the building process of Fossology: Normal call for fedora packages (that I mimic on centos) is: make %{?_smp_mflags} SYSCONFDIR=%{_sysconfdir} However, using SMP features leaded to a build error: Regenerating variables list ...

Re: [FOSSology] FOSSology on RHEL5.3, Report #1 - Required RPMs

2009-02-16 Thread Bruno Cornec
Hello, Matt Taggart said on Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:17:08AM -0800: Hmm, must be a race condition, I'll see if I can add something to prevent that. Thanks. I'm now testing the installation of my packages, and find other small issues. fo-install is using the addgroup command. This one is