The author attribution survey is now closed. We have 1017 complete
responses. I've posted results of the attribution data in the
following report:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Attribution_Survey_Results.pdf
I've posted the raw data of the attribution survey here:
Respondents from En
Pharos wrote:
> My experience has been that, although certainly there is room for
> expansion in scientific articles on specialty topics, Wikipedia
> already has much better coverage of science than any print
> encyclopedias, and most basic scientific subjects are treated fairly
> completely.
>
> I
2009/3/6 Mike Linksvayer :
> Yes.
>
> Mike (not the CC counsel but just spoke to her)
And what was the exact wording of the question asked and what was the
line of reasoning?
--
geni
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsu
2009/3/6 Cary Bass :
>> That's interesting. We should try and get some more up-to-date
>> stats on that - it would be useful for Wikimedia UK to have stats
>> like that to throw around in negotiations, etc., to show how
>> important we are.
>
> For that matter, just look at the contributors to this
Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/3/6 David Gerard :
>> 2009/3/6 Thomas Dalton :
>>> 2009/3/6 Gerard Meijssen :
When the English Wikipedia is the only Wikipedia with BLP
issues, I completely agree.
>>> It's the only Wikipedia where BLP issues significantly affect
>>> UK politicians, which are t
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/3/4 Erik Moeller :
>> 2009/3/3 Thomas Dalton :
>>> Excellent. Getting some idea of community opinion is very important.
>>> However, has anyone carried out my suggestion of consulting with the
>>> CC lawyers?
>>
>> We've been in repeated
2009/3/6 David Gerard :
> 2009/3/6 Thomas Dalton :
>> 2009/3/6 Gerard Meijssen :
>
>>> When the English Wikipedia is the only Wikipedia with BLP issues, I
>>> completely agree.
>
>> It's the only Wikipedia where BLP issues significantly affect UK
>> politicians, which are the subject of the article
2009/3/6 Thomas Dalton :
> 2009/3/6 Gerard Meijssen :
>> When the English Wikipedia is the only Wikipedia with BLP issues, I
>> completely agree.
> It's the only Wikipedia where BLP issues significantly affect UK
> politicians, which are the subject of the article.
Note that en:wp is more Briti
2009/3/6 Gerard Meijssen :
> Hoi,
> When the English Wikipedia is the only Wikipedia with BLP issues, I
> completely agree.
It's the only Wikipedia where BLP issues significantly affect UK
politicians, which are the subject of the article.
___
foundatio
Hoi,
When the English Wikipedia is the only Wikipedia with BLP issues, I
completely agree.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/3/6 Thomas Dalton
> 2009/3/6 David Gerard :
> > Politicians get quite annoyed at this stuff. In my experience they
> > mostly take a certain level of rubbish in their stride, but
2009/3/6 David Gerard :
> Politicians get quite annoyed at this stuff. In my experience they
> mostly take a certain level of rubbish in their stride, but that
> doesn't mean we shouldn't work to improve the situation.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7921985.stm
This article has now bee
Politicians get quite annoyed at this stuff. In my experience they
mostly take a certain level of rubbish in their stride, but that
doesn't mean we shouldn't work to improve the situation.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7921985.stm
- d.
___
fo
A Wikipol is an political program. It is a collection of wiki-pages that
describe the actual stands of (webbased) political parties. The members of
the e-party can develop and update these wiki-pages by amendments.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipol
Jos Janssen
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
