Hoi,
Naoko is Naoko and Aphaia is someone else..
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:Naoko_Komura_December_2008.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e6/Benutzer_Aphaia.jpg
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/3/25 Ivan Lanin
> Dear Aphaia,
>
> I'm really excited to get the result of
Dear Aphaia,
I'm really excited to get the result of this study since one of the common
input that I got from newbie contributors either online or during workshops are
that it's harder for them to write Wikipedia than to write blogs :) Though I
still don't get it why they think that way ;)
Goo
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Naoko Komura
> wrote:
>
> > The remote usability study on
> > Thursday (March 26 PDT) will be done remotely, which means we recruit
> > participants from Wikipedia through the site notice, and connect with
> > them
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Naoko Komura wrote:
> The remote usability study on
> Thursday (March 26 PDT) will be done remotely, which means we recruit
> participants from Wikipedia through the site notice, and connect with
> them through web conferencing.
This is brilliant - you could a
Howdy.
(adding wikien-l folks to this thread. my apology for not including
wikien-l with my initial email.)
The usability study has started today as scheduled. The usability team
is monitoring the interviews and how ten test participants interact with
Wikipedia when they are asked to edit an
2009/3/24 Michael Snow :
> Actually,
> the edit threshold was just changed from 10 to 25 (still pretty low) by
> Erik, maybe he can explain the thinking behind that, as I wasn't aware
> of that decision.
The only reason to tweak the configuration was to move forward the
cut-off date (allowing more
Hello all, this is a very old and often discussed issue,
the problems raised with the logo were not yet addressed (such as copyright
issues, which characters to use), and the new 'logo' is IMHO the most ugly
thing I have ever seen.
Btw.: from alexa.com:
Where people go on Wiktionary.org:
- en.
Hi all,
Just wanted to second Cary's note - we talked about it briefly today.
A single brand identity for the project would be so much stronger, so
I encourage discussion on the matter. I completely appreciate the
challenges and how things have evolved up to this point, but it would
cert
Michael Snow wrote:
> Robert Horning wrote:
>
>> I certainly think my voice ought to count for something, together with
>> other people who are in my position and situation.
>>
>>
> I quite agree with you, and if you check out the licensing update page
> on Meta http://meta.wikimedia.o
Robert Horning wrote:
> My question isn't so much when and where, but rather who can vote on
> this proposal. More to the point, stakeholders in the content of
> Wikimedia sites includes a whole bunch of people who may not necessarily
> fit the criteria that is typical for voting on WMF board m
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> Where can we vote?
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> 2009/3/24 Michael Snow
>
>
>> As Sue has mentioned, the board earlier agreed on a statement regarding
>> the license transition, which is as follows:
>>
>> The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation invites t
Hi all,
The two largest Wiktionary projects (English and French) have two
completely different logos. [1], [2]
The reason for this, from what I understand, is that a vote was taken
place about the logo fr.wiktionary currently has, on meta [3]; which
the English Wiktionary community chose not to
12 matches
Mail list logo
