Going forward, how does the Foundation plan to make large changes to the
software in full consultation with the community consensus?
Is the assumption that all of the members of the community who are
knowledgeable and interested have already signed up to the relevant mailing
lists and all that is
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Robert Rohde wrote:
> I'm not sure how one would make your hook system work in a way that
> was practical and not totally opaque to the editor.
>
> An idea that has been toyed with a couple of other places is to allow
> defined blocks and references to them in artic
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Brion Vibber wrote:
>> As many folks have noted, our current templating system works ok for
>> simple things, but doesn't scale well -- even moderately complex
>> conditionals or text-munging will quickly turn your te
2009/7/1 Brian :
> Editors clearly need a better system for declaring facts about
> articles and then using them in advanced template programming. One can
> imagine an alternate system where his birthday is only declared once,
> like so, in the article text: born on [[birthday::July 6, 1946]]. And
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> As many folks have noted, our current templating system works ok for
> simple things, but doesn't scale well -- even moderately complex
> conditionals or text-munging will quickly turn your template source into
> what appears to be line noise.
Behavior on many projects IS outrageous; when someone complains the
response is almost universally that the foundation doesn't get
involved in local project business.
Mark
skype: node.ue
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> Virgilio A. P. Machado wrote:
>> Marc, you comment
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:01, Ray Saintonge wrote:
>> [1]. The Battle Over Who Owns Bus Arrival Times:
> So why should a local squabble cause such a paranoid panic?
Cos they're living in the United States of Litigations? ;-)
g
___
foundation-l mailing
