On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Nikola Smolenski smole...@eunet.rs wrote:
wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
The image is in the public domain. That's the point.
Public means all public, not limited to the whims of what the boundary
of a certain
country might
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 04:02, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
The WMF have already offered to do it at two timeslots and if these are
sufficiently different from each other then that's about all that can be
done. You're never going to be able to please everyone in this issue.
Agreed,
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Improving_Foundation-l hasn't had any edits
in a couple weeks now. Have we decided this isn't such a big problem after
all? Have we given up? Just waiting a few months for someone to post a
Chad wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Anthony wrote:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Improving_Foundation-l hasn't had any edits
in a couple weeks now. Have we decided this isn't such a big problem after
all? Have we given up? Just waiting a few months for someone to post a
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
The entire page is founded on unsubstantiated and generic complaints
which all lists share. I'm on moderated lists which are completely horrible.
And I'm on unmoderated lists which are absolutely excellent.
Jimmy Wales himself has stated, and I've quoted him in one of
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
The entire page is founded on unsubstantiated and generic complaints
which all lists share. I'm on moderated lists which are completely horrible.
And I'm on unmoderated lists which are absolutely excellent.
Jimmy Wales himself has stated, and I've quoted him in one
