[Foundation-l] Banners to increase editors

2010-03-17 Thread James Heilman
Having trouble posting. Trying again: We had a banner last year to raise funds for the WMF. Unsure if anyone has suggested this yet but how about running a banner to encourage our readers to: 1) add content 2) correct spelling 3) revert vandalism? I have asked many people about their use of Wik

Re: [Foundation-l] Fwd: Living Person Task Force update: Policy writing

2010-03-17 Thread Keegan Peterzell
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Gregory Kohs wrote: > Paul Keegan notes: > > "The Living people task force is churning along." > > After looking for about 2 minutes at the linked Recommendations to the > Board of Trustees/Draft 2, I found numerous grammatical and > typographic errors in the stat

Re: [Foundation-l] How to kill a mailing list

2010-03-17 Thread MZMcBride
Mike.lifeguard wrote: >> August 2009: 1030 >> September 2009: 791 >> October 2009: 326 >> November 2009: 513 >> December 2009: 234 >> January 2010: 207 >> February 2010: 213 >> March 2010: ??? > Does anyone know what the numbers are? Or perhaps this this email a > demonstration?! The number of mes

Re: [Foundation-l] Fwd: Living Person Task Force update: Policy writing

2010-03-17 Thread Gregory Kohs
Paul Keegan notes: "The Living people task force is churning along." After looking for about 2 minutes at the linked Recommendations to the Board of Trustees/Draft 2, I found numerous grammatical and typographic errors in the statement. However, I am disinclined to chip in and help correct these

Re: [Foundation-l] Wikiversity

2010-03-17 Thread phoebe ayers
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Anthony wrote: > What's going on over at Wikiversity?  Jimmy Wales has now been threatened > with a block by someone who seems to be an admin in good standing, and he > responds that he has "the full support of the Wikimedia Foundation".  Is > this true?  What does

[Foundation-l] January 2010 Report to the Board

2010-03-17 Thread James Owen
Report to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Covering: January 2010 Prepared by: Sue Gardner, Executive Director, Wikimedia Foundation Prepared for: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees MILESTONES FROM JANAURY 1.Wikimedia's most successful fundraiser wraps up, raises $8 million (USD) 2.

[Foundation-l] December 2009 Report to the Board of Trustees

2010-03-17 Thread James Owen
Report to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Covering: December 2009 Prepared by: Sue Gardner, Executive Director, Wikimedia Foundation Prepared for: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees MILESTONES FROM DECEMBER 1.Annual Giving Campaign continues: record number of donations 2.New hires:

Re: [Foundation-l] Wikiversity

2010-03-17 Thread Yaroslav M. Blanter
Interesting that just yesterday the Russian Wikipedia arbcom has banned the founder and the only admin of Russian Wikiversity from editing the Wikipedia namespace for systematic disruptive behavior (not related to his Wikiversity activity). Cheers Yaroslav ___

Re: [Foundation-l] Wikiversity

2010-03-17 Thread Thomas Dalton
On 17 March 2010 14:46, Pedro Sanchez wrote: > basically, jimbo is using his power muscle outside english wikipedia and > he's not getting the support he usually has. Therefore, he pokes at the > board. That's my personal reading Well, he doesn't get much support when he does that kind of thing o

Re: [Foundation-l] How to kill a mailing list

2010-03-17 Thread Fred Bauder
What I mean is that there are specialized forums both on and off wiki. We used to discuss individual users and their behavior here. Now that would be on a Noticeboard or a request for arbitration, and yes on a private list. This list just doesn't handle everything anymore. Fred > On Wed, Mar 17,

Re: [Foundation-l] How to kill a mailing list

2010-03-17 Thread Philippe Beaudette
I think Fred meant that rather than being on Foundation-l, they've moved to appropriate places on the various wikis. Correct me if I'm wrong, Fred. :) pb On Mar 17, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Anthony wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Fred Bauder > wrote: > >> Bottom line, serious discus

Re: [Foundation-l] How to kill a mailing list

2010-03-17 Thread Anthony
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Fred Bauder wrote: > Bottom line, serious discussions have moved elsewhere. Progress, I guess, > discussions here never seemed to lead anywhere. Just round and round. > Where have the discussions moved? I assume you're talking about a private list? Any possibil

Re: [Foundation-l] Wikiversity

2010-03-17 Thread Pedro Sanchez
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Anthony wrote: > What's going on over at Wikiversity? Jimmy Wales has now been threatened > with a block by someone who seems to be an admin in good standing, and he > responds that he has "the full support of the Wikimedia Foundation". Is > this true? What doe

Re: [Foundation-l] How to kill a mailing list

2010-03-17 Thread Fred Bauder
Yes, but no need to delete endless repetitive spam from "Anthony" without bothering to read it. Bottom line, serious discussions have moved elsewhere. Progress, I guess, discussions here never seemed to lead anywhere. Just round and round. Fred Bauder > August 2009: 1030 > September 2009: 791 >

Re: [Foundation-l] Wikiversity

2010-03-17 Thread Fred Bauder
I gather there was posting of information which someone determined was harmful to Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation and the suggestion is being made to take that stuff somewhere else, or else. From the discussion I gather that the issue is whether Wikiversity is an open educational resource or

[Foundation-l] Wikiversity

2010-03-17 Thread Anthony
What's going on over at Wikiversity? Jimmy Wales has now been threatened with a block by someone who seems to be an admin in good standing, and he responds that he has "the full support of the Wikimedia Foundation". Is this true? What does it mean? Wales also has said that he is "discussing clo

Re: [Foundation-l] How to kill a mailing list

2010-03-17 Thread Jon Davis
I hardly think this is a "killed" list. If I've got my emails straight, the "soft limit" of 30 emails per month was implemented November 13th, 2009. Don't remember what happened in October... anyways. Declaring the list "dead" because the message count is dead is a major case of edit-count-itis.