On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt
wrote:
> Yep, if you start a article in one version, this article must be continued
> in that version, but this is not a problem for the community (in the past
> yes, now no).
At sr.wp we use the same rule in relation to writing articles i
Hi everyone,
The next strategic planning office hours are:
Tuesday, 2000-21:00 UTC, which is:
-Tuesday (1-2pm PDT)
-Tuesday (4-5pm EDT)
Office hours will be a great opportunity to discuss the work that's
happened as well as the work to come.
As always, you can access the chat by going to
https
On 22 March 2010 20:24, Marcus Buck wrote:
> I hope you speak Portuguese. Cause decisions like this should be made by
> people who know the language variants and their differences and not by
> outsiders. Leave the decision to the speakers of Portuguese. Anyway it
> seems that the majority of speak
Thomas Dalton hett schreven:
> On 22 March 2010 19:01, Virgilio A. P. Machado wrote:
>
>> Perhaps the reason the issue keeps popping up is
>> that, although it has been extensively
>> «discussed», it has not been properly addressed, much less solved.
>>
>
> I think the reason it has never
On 22 March 2010 19:01, Virgilio A. P. Machado wrote:
> Perhaps the reason the issue keeps popping up is
> that, although it has been extensively
> «discussed», it has not been properly addressed, much less solved.
I think the reason it has never been addressed is that nobody outside
the Portugue
On 03/22/2010 08:59 AM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> For those not reading WikiEN-l that actually want the forwarded
> message to be included. ;)
>
Thanks Cary and Thomas!
Per David's suggestion, I'll be posting weekly updates on WikiEN-L and
the Village Pump. It seemed to noisy to post those here
Ever since Mark Williamson posted the message
from Manuel Coutinho suggesting the creation of a
new version of Wikipedia in Portuguese from
Portugal, I have wondered if this list is the
best place to discuss this matter.
This is a very serious and recurring issue:
2005:
http://meta.wikimedia
Yep, if you start a article in one version, this article must be continued
in that version, but this is not a problem for the community (in the past
yes, now no).
Lestaty de Lioncourt
2010/3/22 David Goodman
> If I understand the page in the ptWP correctly, they do not have the
> equivalent of
If I understand the page in the ptWP correctly, they do not have the
equivalent of the enWP rule that topics special to the UK, such as the
article on London, are writing in the UK version of English, and
those special to the US, like the article on New York City , are
written in the American vers
For those not reading WikiEN-l that actually want the forwarded
message to be included. ;)
-- Forwarded message --
From: William Pietri
Date: 20 March 2010 23:22
Subject: [WikiEN-l] Flagged Protection: ready for more testing
To: English Wikipedia
Hi! On behalf of the FlaggedRe
For anyone not following wikien-l.
--
Cary Bass
Volunteer Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation
Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wi
Hello Milos,
The languages pt-pt and pt-br, they do not have a significant difference
(pt-pt in general have a C in the words and pt-br no, among other things not
very important).
The Portuguese Wikipedia have many internal problems and this is the reality
for people always request a new wiki (Se
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> Having two wikipedias for the same language is not allowed within the rules
> of the language policy. The premise that an article on the
> pt.wikipedia.orgis in Portuguese Portuguese is a fallacy. It would be
> the same as stating
> that every article on the English
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:13 AM, oscar wrote:
> it the two are mixed, how to know which one to split off?
> one can also consider to rename the domain and split of portuguese
> portuguese with a separate project to be started from scratch.
>
> in other words: to decide which (sub)community has to
Hoi,
Having two wikipedias for the same language is not allowed within the rules
of the language policy. The premise that an article on the
pt.wikipedia.orgis in Portuguese Portuguese is a fallacy. It would be
the same as stating
that every article on the English language Wikipedia is in American E
it the two are mixed, how to know which one to split off?
one can also consider to rename the domain and split of portuguese
portuguese with a separate project to be started from scratch.
in other words: to decide which (sub)community has to start all over is not
an easy decision.
very best,
osca
16 matches
Mail list logo
