Gordon @ IA was most friendly and helpful. archive-it is a
subscription service for focused collections of sites; he had a
different idea better suited to our work.
Gordon writes:
Now, given the importance of Wikipedia and editorial significant of things
it outlinks-to, perhaps we could set up
Hello,
Right now we in the Bookshelf Project are preparing a number of booklets and
brochures and you are welcome to participate in the work. We look forward to
any comments you may have to any of our deliverables:
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Bookshelf_Project#Deliverables
One of the
Do we send a cc: to Wikimedia tech mailing list?
2010/8/28 Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com
Gordon @ IA was most friendly and helpful. archive-it is a
subscription service for focused collections of sites; he had a
different idea better suited to our work.
Gordon writes:
Now, given the
*What would it take to produce such a feed?**
*
A real-time feed may or may not be the best idea, for several reasons.
- One issue is that every edit would have to be examined not only for
external links, but for external links that were not present previously.
Doing this real-time may cause
A real time feed wouldn't be a smart idea neither would only new links. New
external links are probably the most reliable ones, if they dont work today
then theres probably no point in preserving them. Link rot is the biggest
problem here, external links which might be 5-6 years old or more. I
*A real time feed wouldn't be a smart idea neither would only new links. New
external links are probably the most reliable ones.
*After reading this part i am not entirely certain if you caught my drift
correctly, or if you missed it somehow. In case you understood it correctly
apologies for
