phoebe ayers, 27/09/2010 06:47:
If so, I'd be curious to hear how it worked for the Hungarian community!
There's also a version of reader ratings enabled on the English
Wikinews: http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Main_Page
And more:
'wmgUseReaderFeedback' = array(
//
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 18:29 +0200, Milos Rancic wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 14:58, Daniel ~ Leinad danny.lei...@gmail.com wrote:
Look here http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Step-by-step_chapter_creation_guide
and here http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Local_chapter_FAQ.
Plus to convince
Hoi,
I doubt very much that political considerations should be part of the set up
of a chapter. Asking the Serbian chapter for an opinion is fine. Giving them
a vote on this is not. Given that Kosovo is a separate jurisdiction means
that it fulfils the basic requirement. Given that Hong Kong and
lets first await how things develop, whether there are enough people being
involved, if a chapter is actually the most useful format for their
activities in the first place - before we are going to get into the whole
political question of whether Kosovo is a seperate jurisdiction or not and
what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/09/2010 19:47, Peter Damian wrote:
To the other
Wikipedians here: is there a problem with academics 'talking down'? Do they
have a problem explaining their ideas in articles? Are they 'too rarified'
to be included in Wikipedia? If so,
Hoi,
So you want them to first organise things with the understanding that they
will not be accepted as a chapter? In the language committee we have the
grace to first decide on eligibility and then decide if all the requirements
are met.
Yes I understand your reasoning but it means either that
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:14, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
I doubt very much that political considerations should be part of the set up
of a chapter. Asking the Serbian chapter for an opinion is fine. Giving them
a vote on this is not. Given that Kosovo is a separate
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 14:06, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:14, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
I doubt very much that political considerations should be part of the set up
of a chapter. Asking the Serbian chapter for an opinion is fine.
A few posts back Peter linked to several philosophy-trained editors
who had left Wikipedia, representing them as examples of the problems
he has identified.
I think it's worth reposting here what one of those editors gave as
his reasons for leaving:
[quote]
1. No one is accountable, nor does
Ehm, you probably misunderstood me. I did not try to say that they will not
be accepted, I tried exactly to avoid saying things like that. I think we
cannot make any decision on that - and that the question is more complicated
than it is put now. Chapcom has not been invented for academic matters,
In a message dated 9/27/2010 7:17:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
nawr...@gmail.com writes:
1. No one is accountable, nor does anyone feel responsible, for the
accuracy of Wikipedia articles, since they are unsigned and have no
official authors.
--
The authors can be viewed in the
Wjohnson, I'd appreciate it if you would take a little more care when
you quote my posts. Your repost made it appear as though what you were
responding to was originally written by me, as opposed to having been
quoted by me.
Don't forget, by the way, that there is a limit to the number of posts
On 27 September 2010 10:14, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
I doubt very much that political considerations should be part of the set up
of a chapter. Asking the Serbian chapter for an opinion is fine. Giving them
a vote on this is not. Given that Kosovo is a separate
Bence from the hu.wp community was kind enough to reach out via the
Communications Committee about the hu.wp experience with the feature.
The implementation on hu.wp actually merges article feedback with their
implementation of flagged revs. But according to Bence, the number of
ratings
Based on patrolling thousands of speedies and prod deletions at enWP,
of the people whose articles get rejected at enWP, I would say that
fewer than 20% of them have even the least likelihood of becoming
helpful regular editors. (and I've the reputation of taking an
extremely broad view of what
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 19:13, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
If the Kosovans are willing to wait, it would be make our lives much
easier if we wait until the international community makes up their
minds, but that could take a while (it's been 2.5 years already).
I started to
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 19:13, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
If the Kosovans are willing to wait, it would be make our lives much
easier if we wait until the international community makes up their
minds,
Think big Milos. Wikimedia Germany is even better organized than Kosovo. Let
Kosovo alone and put Germany in Serbia.
Now seriously:
Who do you think can succeed better promoting the projects in Kosovo,
Wikimedia Serbia, Wikimedia Kosovo, or both?
We are here to promote Wikimedia projects not to
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 22:02, Joan Goma jrg...@gmail.com wrote:
Think big Milos. Wikimedia Germany is even better organized than Kosovo. Let
Kosovo alone and put Germany in Serbia.
This is the good point. I am actually working on that. Seriously.
Who do you think can succeed better promoting
Hi,
I noticed it through the Wikimedia server log and keep an interest how
it goes. Already one month passed ... could you please give us a
review and report, even as interim?
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:51 AM, GoEthe.wiki goethe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
At ptwiki, we recently implemented a
News and notes: French million, controversial content, Citizendium
charter, Pending changes, and more
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2010-09-27/News_and_notes
In the news: Wikimedia moves into India, critical conference,
Vandalism detection contest
The videos Wikimedia recently produced are available on Youtube,
Facebook and several other sites. Can somebody from the Foundation who
has access to the videos update them and include the subtitles in
several different languages that were provided by Wikimedians on Commons
(see the file
22 matches
Mail list logo
