On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
So, are we doomed to experience such things every once in a while? Or
does anyone have a bright idea about improving the balance between
ownership and wiki-ness?
What was it that lasted only a minute, Chris?
Vandalism, probably. I've read an article that vandalism lasts about a minute!
Domas
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:13, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com wrote:
What was it that lasted only a minute, Chris?
Vandalism, probably. I've read an article that vandalism lasts about a minute!
Impossible. I'm sure one minute has passed but I still see vandalism
occasionally. :-)
g
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 16:15, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
2011/6/17 Peter Gervai grin...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 15:24, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
I am not sure it is a valuable contributor who do not accept the base
of the
2011/6/18 Peter Gervai grin...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:13, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com wrote:
What was it that lasted only a minute, Chris?
Vandalism, probably. I've read an article that vandalism lasts about a
minute!
Impossible. I'm sure one minute has passed but I
Ha, to clarify, the entire background on any visited page was replaced with
swastikas and porn; along the top read brought to you by meepsheep, who
I've since learned is a blocked user.
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/18 Peter Gervai grin...@gmail.com:
On 06/17/11 7:15 AM, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
2011/6/17 Peter Gervaigrin...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 15:24, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
In such cases, as an Israeli saying goes, i am right, but i am not
clever. It hurts that person and it hurts the project, because that
person may
On 06/17/11 5:01 PM, Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis wrote:
I am a bit biased since I have a project to add a trust metric on mediawiki
but I think that content ownership is important. It lets us evaluate the
content without reading it which is important to most of us who are only
experts on one
a blocked user with a looong list of sock puppets
_
*Béria Lima*
http://wikimedia.pt/(351) 925 171 484
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre
acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a
fazer
The fact that the truth is determined by consensus between experts and
unknowledgeable or between people with contrary ideas is a problem.
It is not a process that derives the truth since the truth is defined by the
many,
There are some technology changes that could make this much easier.
1) make it easy to see *your last version* of an article when you visit it.
2) provide a link to 'diffs since your last edit'
2.1) provide a way to comment directly on that diff, without having to
laboriously cut and paste
3)
11 matches
Mail list logo
