Looks like an excellent waste of effort.
Maybe the problem of publishing non-publishable oral sources occurred to
someone on the team. Anyway the english wikipedia seems to be the
appropriate place for your original research. I can't wait to read all about
it.
I still think a research project in
Good job.
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Barry Newstead wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Below is a note I've prepared that takes a look at the year past and
> the year ahead for the Wikimedia Foundation's Global Development team.
>
> An editable and formatted version can be found at
>
> http://meta.wiki
What is your intention here, Elizabeth, besides trolling?
2011/7/26 whothis
> Looks like an excellent waste of effort.
>
> Maybe the problem of publishing non-publishable oral sources occurred to
> someone on the team. Anyway the english wikipedia seems to be the
> appropriate place for your ori
Hi,
We have written a page on wikimediafoundation.org[1] that clarifies how the
Wikimedia Foundation treats user feedback from new tools such as
ArticleFeedback[2] and
MoodBar.[3]
The intention of this page is to clarify for users that their
contributions through these (and future) tools are equi
Geoff Brigham wrote:
> We have written a page on wikimediafoundation.org[1] that clarifies how the
> Wikimedia Foundation treats user feedback from new tools such as
> ArticleFeedback[2] and MoodBar.[3]
>
> [...]
>
> [1] http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Feedback
> [2] http://www.mediawiki.org/wi
