On 8/6/2011 4:00 PM, Florence Devouard wrote:
> On 8/6/11 1:36 AM, Michael Snow wrote:
>> On 8/5/2011 4:26 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Michael Snow
>>> wrote:
.. Honestly, I must say that it
is a colossal disappointment to find that with all the post
On 8/6/11 1:36 AM, Michael Snow wrote:
> On 8/5/2011 4:26 PM, John Vandenberg wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Michael Snow wrote:
>>> .. Honestly, I must say that it
>>> is a colossal disappointment to find that with all the posts I've seen
>>> both here and on internal-l, nobody has ye
On Aug 6, 2011, at 3:14 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> Hello MZM, thanks for taking a start at new pages to illustrate the
> discussion on Meta.
>
> MZMcBride writes:
> .
>
>
>> Anyone who thinks that this particular issue
>> is outside of this list's scope is insane. Using internal-l as a sub
On Aug 6, 2011, at 2:41 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> Hello Birgitte,
>
> Thank you for these comments and edits/suggestions. [all: please also
> post suggestions on Meta. most people are not subscribed to this
> list.]
>
> This Board letter was published on short notice. Once it was clear
>
Hi,
I've got an awkward feeling toward this whole thread. I'll try to explain why.
For years, every single discussion has been WMF versus the chapters.
few years ago it kinda made sense as we had so different issues and we
were trying to codify the relationship between our organizations
through a
The more I read the Board's letter the more difficult I find it to
interpret. There's one reading on which it says only a few (albeit
important) things that aren't already in the 2011 Fundraising Agreements.
There is another reading in which it says that actually no chapters will be
participating i
> Meta link:
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Board_Report,_May-June_2011
>
> -- phoebe
Thanks for the link, Phoebe. Since none of the meta pages linked to this
page, I created
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Board_Reports
which I hope will be updated on a regular basis by adding new reports.
C
Hello MZM, thanks for taking a start at new pages to illustrate the
discussion on Meta.
MZMcBride writes:
> I fail to see how violating the community's principles of transparency and
> accountability by keeping everything on a non-public list is any better. I
> just hope nobody's discussing anyt
Hello Birgitte,
Thank you for these comments and edits/suggestions. [all: please also
post suggestions on Meta. most people are not subscribed to this
list.]
This Board letter was published on short notice. Once it was clear
that the issue should be raised and discussed this year, we wanted to
