Dear all;
Looks like we have a big ally in the digitisation of public domain content
issue[1]:
The Europeana Foundation has published a policy statement, the Public
Domain Charter, to highlight the value of public domain content in the
knowledge economy. It alerts Europe's museums, libraries,
Please note that this policy statement is dated May 2010, it does not
appear to be changed since then (hurray.)
Mathias
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
Yes,
Wikimedia Chapters (especially the Dutch - where they are based, and the
Swedish - who have a joint project with them) are working with Europeana in
a variety of ways. One example is how Wikimedia groups have hosted
hackathons using their open datasets and API and (independently) won a prize
Forwarding from Maarten Zeinstra (who is not subscribed to this list, I've
cc'd him):
I am not part of a European Wikimedia chapter. However, I am part of the
Europeana RD team on intellectual property. Europeana published its Public
Domain Charter about a year ago and is steadily working
emijrp, 25/10/2011 12:30:
Looks like we have a big ally in the digitisation of public domain content
issue[1]:
The Europeana Foundation has published a policy statement, the Public
Domain Charter, to highlight the value of public domain content in the
knowledge economy. It alerts Europe's
...a deletion discussion among
non-professionals is not the proper way to determine the law.
Neither is the opinion of a legal expert: That's the job of the courts.
Courts are the proper way to determine the law after the fact. But
this is a question of determining the law before the fact.
There was a 30 post per person monthly soft limit on foundation-l.
My apologies; I was unaware of this soft limit.
Happy to abide by it :) and I hope others will too! And, so, this should be
my last post for this month. FWIW I entirely agree that less vocal posters
may be put off by large
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Thomas Morton
morton.tho...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think people who think have got the point, but we still have to whack
the mole at trolls and endless griefers.
I'm also annoyed at being characterised in this way by someone who has
maintained only the
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.com
wrote:
There was a 30 post per person monthly soft limit on foundation-l.
My apologies; I was unaware of this soft limit.
Happy to abide by it :) and I hope others will too! And, so, this should be
my last
On 25 October 2011 17:52, Andreas K. jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
For those interested, there is a current request for arbitration on English
Wikipedia related to the board resolution on controversial content, which
contains some further views and discussion. I have summarised my view that
our
I think it's relative (like everything, anyway)
When we were discussing about image filter I remember over one hundred-mails.
It was a good discussion. It would be hilarious if someone speak ''Hey
everybody, we exceed the thirty messages soft limit, let's end this discussion
right now.'' :P
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:55 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 October 2011 17:52, Andreas K. jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
For those interested, there is a current request for arbitration on
English
Wikipedia related to the board resolution on controversial content, which
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.orgwrote:
Hi,
thanks for the extra info. It would be great if a more extensive timeline
could be entered into the actual information page. Dates I would be looking
for:
* When should translations be finished for the first
Quick reminder that the appeal from the community could use some help. A
couple people have started so far. That's really great - thanks for helping
out.
Please take a couple minutes and share some thoughts. Send it around to
anyone who might be interested.
Thanks!
Megan
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011
On 10/25/2011 2:57 PM, foundation-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
You've made quite a few incorrect assumptions there.
Of course Commons editors should be deciding which images are PD. But
when there is a dispute, it makes no sense for people who don't even
know what a derivative work
15 matches
Mail list logo
