On 02/25/12 10:30 AM, Castelo wrote:
On 25-02-2012 15:58, Michael Peel wrote:
Actually, Wikipedia sort of is the place for original content - when
it comes to illustrations in articles.
Those illustrations are mainly in Commons, with exception of the
images in fair use, but linked in the articl
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Kevin Gorman wrote:
> His most recent comment on the video: " Just found out about WikiNews.org 5
> minutes ago. Whoops. "
>
> so.. looks like he did this as a mockup and literally didn't know that it
> was already a thing.
>
>
Yes, I contacted him and he said:
H
On 02/23/12 5:48 PM, Florence Devouard wrote:
But the most difficult ennoying point is simply that most corp
archives appear to be a mess. Because companies are bought and sold,
information is lost on the way. Because of poor communication between
departments. Because staff come and go. And bec
His most recent comment on the video: " Just found out about WikiNews.org 5
minutes ago. Whoops. "
so.. looks like he did this as a mockup and literally didn't know that it
was already a thing.
---
Kevin Gorman
User:Kgorman-ucb
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Andrew Lih wrote:
> On Mon, Feb
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 27 February 2012 20:18, Nathan wrote:
> > It looks like it's just a promotion for Wikinews. It doesn't refer to or
> > link anywhere else. It's not totally accurate, from what I understand of
> > Wikinews, but I'm not sure how it's a thr
On 27 February 2012 20:18, Nathan wrote:
> It looks like it's just a promotion for Wikinews. It doesn't refer to or
> link anywhere else. It's not totally accurate, from what I understand of
> Wikinews, but I'm not sure how it's a threat?
Yes, it is clearly talking about our Wikinews. It's very o
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Nathan wrote:
> It looks like it's just a promotion for Wikinews. It doesn't refer to or
> link anywhere else. It's not totally accurate, from what I understand of
> Wikinews, but I'm not sure how it's a threat?
>
In the video, the motto and the screenshot have
Will not be competing that well, we are number one and on google, and yahoo,
it does not show the new WikiNews.
On 12-02-27 4:03 PM, "Jason Safoutin" wrote:
> This is interesting. Upon my daily sift through Google News for agencies
> that might post Wikinews articles, I came across this (A vide
It looks like it's just a promotion for Wikinews. It doesn't refer to or
link anywhere else. It's not totally accurate, from what I understand of
Wikinews, but I'm not sure how it's a threat?
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Lodewijk wrote:
> Hi Castelo,
>
> just to make the discussion clearer: could you just give say 5 or 10
> examples of topics where you believe oral citations are unavoidable? Then I
> hope that Ziko in his turn can explain how we can write about those
> examples wi
On 02/22/12 11:40 AM, Thomas Morton wrote:
Material on Wikipedia can be divided into "fact" and "opinion". The latter
of these is, perhaps confusingly, the simplest to address; because opinion,
viewpoints and perception can quite easily be collated and summarised. The
only real difficulty exists
On 02/26/12 2:58 PM, M. Williamson wrote:
Ziko, you raise the subject of "illiterates"... I feel that it is blatant
discrimination to assert that the only way illiterates can create sources
worthy of citation on Wikipedia is either by becoming literate, or by being
interviewed by a literate perso
12 matches
Mail list logo
