2012/3/2 Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org:
On 1 March 2012 18:27, Béria Lima berial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello people,
So after receive authorization from all candidates, the list of candidates
+ statements are in meta, and you can find it here: http'://
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
That sounds reasonable. Most things discussed on this list are not
specially relevant to the Foundation.
OK. Any strong objections to changing the
On 1 March 2012 09:14, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
That new list wouldn't be intended to replace foundation-l (which
would continue to be used for matters strictly related to the
Wikimedia Foundation) or to internal-l (which may have some legitimate
uses, although I personally find
From: Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Chapter Selected Board Seats - Time for
questions
Message-ID:
caf-odcvqatfofxutfelwhmoly-tau3qa4lvqd6whct7+sod...@mail.gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
The full proposal is here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l_proposal
I think there's another way we could slice the cake:
(a) a mailing list for discussing Foundation, chapter and management
... Maybe just
Both pieces of news are amazing. Thank you for the heads-up. :) SJ
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
2012/3/1 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
Other companies doing similarly:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/2 Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org:
On 1 March 2012 18:27, Béria Lima berial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello people,
So after receive authorization from all candidates, the list of candidates
+ statements are in
Well, I think Shizhao is subscribed to this list :-) but I cc: him
just in case.
This sounds like a reasonable request. Can one of the developers
involved comment on the situation?
Ziyuan: can you post a link to the discussion on the chinese wikipedia
about whether to upgrade?
SJ
On Wed, Feb
Thanks Beria for taking the initiative for making the list of candidates
and statements on a public wiki.
It brings in more transparency and better understanding of the process to
the whole of the Wikimedia World.
All the best wishes to the candidates!
Regards
Tinu Cherian
Wikimedia India.
On
Yesterday I started two discussion threads for this issue, one one the
Wikizh-l mailing list, the other on the zh.wikipedia Google Group
(both are official discussion lists for the Chinese Wikipedia):
Wikizh-l thread: (in Chinese)
Actually, the MediaWiki extension Collection developed by PediaPress
is based on a PDF generation library ReportLab, which doesn't
support Chinese very well (for example, so far, a Chinese line in a
generated PDF doesn't take up the full width of a page; there is still
much space unused to the
The recently launched[4] WikiQueer website has a system for
transcluding Wikipedia content[1] and appears to have a background
negotiated with the Wikimedia Foundation.
Can someone confirm the nature of any special relationship with the
website and the nonprofit that runs it?[3]
1.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Fae fae...@gmail.com wrote:
The recently launched[4] WikiQueer website has a system for
transcluding Wikipedia content[1] and appears to have a background
negotiated with the Wikimedia Foundation.
Can someone confirm the nature of any special relationship with
13 matches
Mail list logo
