Re: [Foundation-l] "stumble upon" in wikimedia? citation collection, where researchers want to be included in future?

On 11/28/08, THURNER rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > some sites to cite an article about medical visualization [2]. when > looking at it i noticed: > * that it is published in a cc-2.5 licensed journal > * that there is a possibility to enter links from facebook, stumble upon, > ... > * that

Re: [Foundation-l] 80% of our projects are failing

On 12/1/08, Andrew Whitworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To do the second task we would still want to create projects in > small languages so we could write learning resources to teach > people the big languages. I for one would enjoy learning resources targeted at those wishing to learn the "sma

Re: [Foundation-l] 80% of our projects are failing

On 12/2/08, Milos Rancic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is no article about the ultimate fate of the universe on sr.wp, > while there is no article about Grgur Branković on en.wp. Conclusion > about usefulness is obvious: for the most of pupils and their parents > the article about Grgur Branko

Re: [Foundation-l] Chinese wikinews in China Blocked

On 1/10/09, Chen Minqi wrote: > > > Here are some results from the above web page. > > Tested From:Shanghai, China > Resolved As:208.80.152.2 > Status:Empty reply from server > Response Time:0.414 sec > > Tested From:

Re: [Foundation-l] Chinese wikinews in China Blocked

what i meant to say is. at least the english site is still accessible, which is odd (i mis-read the subject line) because the latter site has quite a bit more anti-PRC content. weird... ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsub

Re: [Foundation-l] Chinese wikinews in China Blocked

> As we know, all wikimedia sites used to be completely blocked in mainland > China since 2005 (temporary blocking started in 2004). When they started to > unblock the wikimedia sites in 2006, they unblocked all the non-Chinese > sites first and later some Chinese projects, such as Chinese Wikition

Re: [Foundation-l] FW: [Wikinews-l] Increased incivility at wikinews [en]

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Marc Riddell wrote: > When will you people finally acknowledge that there is something terribly > wrong with the deteriorating level of discourse occurring in the Projects? One does not know deteriorated discourse unless they've, you know, lived in the projects.[1]

Re: [Foundation-l] History splitting (main namespace)

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Lars Aronsson wrote: > Emanuele Casadio wrote: > >> This would be a great idea but, wait a minute... will this procedure >> be GFDL-compliant? > > When we renamed [[en:Angola/History]] to [[en:History of Angola]] > (after it was decided that subpages was a bad idea

Re: [Foundation-l] History splitting (main namespace)

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 1:50 PM, David Goodman wrote: > Perhaps we simply need to establish that a link to a WP article is a > GFDL reference, and let it go at that, without the complications. When > the rules get into the position of hampering the writing of the > encyclopedia ... As I was tryin

Re: [Foundation-l] Proposed revised attribution language

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote: >> If the people producing the mugs want that they are free to produce a >> version of the history on their servers or more legally more solid >> include a sheet of paper with a complete list of authors with the mug. > > It's hard to know who's

Re: [Foundation-l] Take a look at the latest rep watches

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Michael Bimmler wrote: > No one approved it (see headers, there is no Approved-on line). But I > found a legacy entry in the "Always accept posts from these > non-members" filter for anth...@wikimedia.org...  Well, I removed that > line now, as Anthere is not using