On wikimedia projects that are not Wikipedia (Wikia in specific comes
to mind) I often find myself using templates that have not been
defined on that installation. The English Wikipedia (which I am most
familiar with) has many very usefull templates, especially the
{{citeFoo}} templates, but numero
A while back, I think the WMF got offered the enwp.org domain for
free, which is a fairly oft used shortener. Does anyone remember what
ever happened to that offer?
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Waldir Pimenta wrote:
> wi.ki, on the other hand, would be safe in this regard :)
>
> By the way, s
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 4:20 PM, David Levy wrote:
> Martijn Hoekstra wrote:
>
>> > Back to the issue at hand though: Thomas is (quite generously)
>> > offering the enwp.org domain. Would the foundation like to have it?
>
> Gerard Meijssen replied:
>
>> The w
Back to the issue at hand though: Thomas is (quite generously)
offering the enwp.org domain. Would the foundation like to have it?
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Mono mium wrote:
> I looked into this once...the domain price was quite steep or I would
> have gotten it. However, a donation might b
I tried it about half a dozen times on my HTC desire. The user experience is
truly dreadful, and I'm not trying it again.
Op 12 apr. 2011 21:02 schreef "David Gerard" het
volgende:
> On 12 April 2011 19:46, Quim Gil wrote:
>
>> In fact Wikimedia content is also popular among mobile users (directl
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Austin Hair wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Kim Bruning wrote:
>> See
>>
>> http://www.bnr.nl/programma/bnrdigitaal/2011/03/30/minder-schrijvers-wikipedia-door-agressie1
>
> Dit is niet nieuw, natuurlijk.
>
> I've lived in the Netherlands for a
Indeed. It always starts with the finer details of CC 3.0. and it may
well end in genocide.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Teofilo wrote:
> French authorship rights law:
>
> Article L121-1
> An author shall enjoy the right to respect for his name, his
> authorship and his work.
> Th
