thread, not
an image filter conspiracy thread :)
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
-on-telstra/531627.aspx
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
is that the dewiki poll being worded in a manner that is
pleasing to people who have critiqued the Foundation-wide survey does
not render it representative, when it was participated in by at most
one eightieth of the members of the community whom we know to have an
opinion on the matter.
--
Stephen
things been part of the proposal?
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
anarcho-libertarians either.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
bodies filter is described as not including Egyptian
mummies, someone could decide to hide all images by default. This
doesn't have to be difficult.
--
[1] Which, naturally, includes actual images of people undertaking all
sorts of activities involving human genitals.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b
not suitable to be
covered in articles. This is an editorial decision-making process that
all editors perform all the time. Determining which filters to work on
is entirely analogous to this process, which is inherently neutral.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
are
they not at present under enough pressure to avoid using Wikimedia
projects (or at least articles where such pictures would be expected
to be present) entirely?
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l
to hide all images is also implemented, we can
quite simply add a disclaimer when anyone goes to turn on a filter
indicating that if complete exclusion is particularly important to
them, they should choose the option to hide everything by default.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
, and beg for their absolution.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
, and in that regard Wikipedia has
needed no assistance in drawing attention and contributions away from
Wikinews. What good is yesterday's synthesis today?
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
, and to have the largest possible impact. Even if a first
deployment is Wikipedia, they will generally benefit other projects as
well.
I believe the correct name for that is the trickle-down effect :)
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l
for all ages.
Britannica never had authors putting pictures of their own genitals
throughout each volume because NOTCENSORED.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
satisfactory 'yes' in answer to the question of
whether it is worth the devs' time coding beginning development. We're
merely talking about a proposed software feature here.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation
the level/quantity of dev
resources that should be allocated to developing it.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
-to-see
crowd gives their blessing, to develop and implement...)
The questions are all relating to the development of the feature, save
for the 'culturally neutral' question: the first is about how to
prioritise it, and the others are about setting out the specs for the
feature.
--
Stephen Bain
On Sep 6, 2011 6:43 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
However, you initially claimed the referendum itself constituted
support for the feature itself:
It provides a quite satisfactory 'yes' in answer to the question of
whether it is worth the devs' time coding beginning development.
On Sep 6, 2011 7:11 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
The mean and median are statistical gibberish in a distribution that
pathologically bimodal. You should know better than to make any claim
that the numbers you quote are meaningful.
16% of respondents chose '0' and 20% chose '10'.
composition,
and the increasing dominance of the executive).
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
umbrella, would there still be enough connection to the Foundation's
operations to render it desirable that they be enfranchised? (I would
think so.)
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
-Wikimedia extension devs, Wikia devs, etc. Not that I
know how many of them there are.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation
$4 M of non-fundraiser revenue, the fundraiser needed to meet $4.8 M
to cover 'urgent' expenses, a mark it hit on Nov 25.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 January 2011 13:45, Stephen Bain stephen.b...@gmail.com wrote:
This puts a ceiling on 'urgent' costs at $8.8 M, or 43% of the budget
of $20.4 M. [3]
This is a worthwhile analysis, but you have neglected
attract
more people with the institution of Wikipedia than the institution of
Wikimedia.
So wait, why was the choice made?
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
the institution of
Wikimedia.
Thanks for the explanation. It seems some people assumed bad faith
before, when really we can see it was just a good-natured attempt to
deceive these people as to where their money would go.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
, and today there are many
more than 32 sites that clone Wikipedia, so this trick is also becoming
useless.
If you have Firefox there's an addon that will let you filter out
mirrors (among other things). See:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mirror_filter
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
to be expert in French copyright law when
contesting copyright claims by French companies, and the answer is
yes.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
, these are just teething issues with finding exactly the right
parameters (lighting, amount of AA, other postprocessing, etc) for the
render. Would the people working on the logo be able to make the 3D
model available for people to play with?
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
environments.
To that end, does anyone know what happened to that project to embed
3D models of chemical compounds?
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
to be out of date in other
ways too.
Any reason why this isn't in SVN?
--
(1) http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikipedia_iPhone_app
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
This post below, I've pretty much ignored
because it wasn't worth trying to sort through who said what.
Yet instead of deleting it, you included the whole thing.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
versions of Wikimedia content
may strip or substitute links while retaining images (though you would
hope they would strip most templates too).
Stephen Bain,
- managing to trim replies and avoid top-posting from his mobile device
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
is that it's not unreasonable to expect something more concrete when
there are people getting paid to do the work.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
usage), that is sitting
around waiting to be configured like a production server for testing?
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Anthonywikim...@inbox.org wrote:
It seems to me to be begging the question. You don't answer the question
how bad is vandalism by assuming that vandalism is generally reverted.
Can you suggest a better metric then?
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
they know in their hearts that the Schulze method is stupid,
and their heads just want to make sure.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
advice from a professional photographer who
doesn't understand what a licence is.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
the browser (in mobile devices, for example). It's much closer
to being the de facto standard of the web than Theora is.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
a party who reprints public domain material, as was the case in Feist v.
Rural (the supreme court case you mention.)
They want people to use their service. Fair enough, given that the
scanning and OCRing happened on their dime.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
and retaining GFDL only for legacy content?
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wants to use our
content under any such license is welcome, and we will treat yours
similarly, under the presumption that any court would regard the
differences as insignificant.
Please tell me you didn't vote on the licensing transition proposal.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
), you can leave a comment about how
you feel here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiktionary/logo/refresh#Begin_from_Scratch
:-)
I couldn't resist making a prototype:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wiktionary/logo/refresh#Suggestion
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.b...@gmail.com
45 matches
Mail list logo
