Re: [Foundation-l] �lliam Pietri: Where is Flagge dRevisions?

2010-03-02 Thread Mike.lifeguard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 37-01--10 03:59 PM, Peter Gervai wrote: > Are you aware of the fact that it's been used in non-English > wikipedias for years? And it's been quite a successful feature. > > YMMV. > grin > > Are you aware it's been used on enwikibooks too? And ha

Re: [Foundation-l] �lliam Pietri: Where is Flagge dRevisions?

2010-03-01 Thread Mike.lifeguard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 37-01--10 03:59 PM, Alex wrote: > Why > this wasn't done before it was deployed on dewiki or anywhere else, I > don't know Because only enwiki matters? - -Mike -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuMb5sACg

Re: [Foundation-l] �lliam Pietri: Where is Flagge dRevisions?

2010-03-01 Thread geni
On 1 March 2010 04:18, Aphaia wrote: > Not a sarcasm, but I would like to point out SUL, single user login > took years to implement to the project wikis, and we even called once > it "Godot". FlaggedRevs implementation also - it took years to > realize. Months are relatively shorter, and I hope y

Re: [Foundation-l] �lliam Pietri: Where is Flagge dRevisions?

2010-03-01 Thread K. Peachey
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Alex wrote: > The English Wikipedia isn't asking for a total rewrite of the extension. > FlaggedRevs was always (at least since it was first deployed) highly > customizable. I believe the "Flagged Protection" feature was able to be > implemented, or very close to it

Re: [Foundation-l] �lliam Pietri: Where is Flagge dRevisions?

2010-03-01 Thread Alex
The English Wikipedia isn't asking for a total rewrite of the extension. FlaggedRevs was always (at least since it was first deployed) highly customizable. I believe the "Flagged Protection" feature was able to be implemented, or very close to it, at the time the proposal was finalized. Supposedly

Re: [Foundation-l] �lliam Pietri: Where is Flagge dRevisions?

2010-03-01 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, One of the things developers are not necessarily good at is communication as in keeping everyone up to date. With the many channels secret and not so secret. With the ferocity that many say typify the mailing lists, it is no wonder that we hear few if any updates. In my opinion the reason why

Re: [Foundation-l] �lliam Pietri: Where is Flagge dRevisions?

2010-03-01 Thread Casey Brown
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Aphaia wrote: > Not a sarcasm, but I would like to point out SUL, single user login > took years to implement to the project wikis, and we even called once > it "Godot". FlaggedRevs implementation also - it took years to > realize. Months are relatively shorter, a

Re: [Foundation-l] �lliam Pietri: Where is Flagge dRevisions?

2010-02-28 Thread Mike.lifeguard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 37-01--10 03:59 PM, William Pietri wrote: > I've reported when I thought I had something to report I think the problem here is that you haven't reported any accomplishments because there haven't been any. Perhaps you're actually saying that the wo

Re: [Foundation-l] �lliam Pietri: Where is Flagge dRevisions?

2010-02-28 Thread Aphaia
Not a sarcasm, but I would like to point out SUL, single user login took years to implement to the project wikis, and we even called once it "Godot". FlaggedRevs implementation also - it took years to realize. Months are relatively shorter, and I hope you guys could wait for in a less pain. On Mon

Re: [Foundation-l] �lliam Pietri: Where is Flagge dRevisions?

2010-02-28 Thread Mike.lifeguard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 37-01--10 03:59 PM, William Pietri wrote: > The thing we're working on right now is moving flaggedrevs.labs to > different hardware. OK, but hasn't it been *months*?! Isn't there a dedicated team for this rollout?! What work are they actually doing