[Foundation-l] "All human knowledge", by Jimmy Wales (?)

2011-09-16 Thread Ziko van Dijk
Hello, Today I read on a WMDE driven website: "»Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der das gesamte Wissen der Menschheit jedem frei zugänglich ist. Das ist unser Ziel.« Jimmy Wales" (Imagine a world in which the entire knowledge of mankind is freely accessible to everyone. That is our goal.) I

Re: [Foundation-l] "All human knowledge", by Jimmy Wales (?)

2011-09-16 Thread KIZU Naoko
I'm afraid it sounds a bit OT, but I'm serious, really. On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Ziko van Dijk wrote: > Hello, > > Today I read on a WMDE driven website: > > "»Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der das gesamte Wissen der > Menschheit jedem frei zugänglich ist. Das ist unser Ziel.« > Jim

Re: [Foundation-l] "All human knowledge", by Jimmy Wales (?)

2011-09-16 Thread David Richfield
> And I think that there is a huge difference between "the sum of > all..." and "all...". By the way, the traditional encyclopedias > described themselves by "the sum of all..." Can you explain this perceived difference? Is the whole more than the sum of its parts, so that the German claim is too

Re: [Foundation-l] "All human knowledge", by Jimmy Wales (?)

2011-09-16 Thread emijrp
I think that the phrase meaning refered to Wikipedia is "the sum of all human knowledge which is notable and encyclopedic". Not ALL, ALL, ALL human knowledge. MySpace discarded. 2011/9/16 Ziko van Dijk > Hello, > > Today I read on a WMDE driven website: > > "»Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in

Re: [Foundation-l] "All human knowledge", by Jimmy Wales (?)

2011-09-16 Thread KIZU Naoko
Don't worry emijrp, I guess no German may hit your idea - MySpace things may be unproblematic omitted in convention: For knowing mere facts, they don't use this word - it's Kennen or Kenntnis. Not Wissen. I'd like to add, while German is not my mother tongue, in the German language "Wissen" is not

Re: [Foundation-l] "All human knowledge", by Jimmy Wales (?)

2011-09-16 Thread Robert Rohde
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:01 PM, emijrp wrote: > I think that the phrase meaning refered to Wikipedia is "the sum of all > human knowledge which is notable and encyclopedic". > > Not ALL, ALL, ALL human knowledge. MySpace discarded. When you look back to when that quote was issued (at least 2004

Re: [Foundation-l] "All human knowledge", by Jimmy Wales (?)

2011-09-16 Thread emijrp
Hi; Perhaps, you may want to help me compiling information about this topic and improving the estimate.[1] There is a false sensation about Wikipedia being almost complete. In the other hand, projects like WikiSource are in their infance, for example, Internet Archive hosts about 3 million public

Re: [Foundation-l] "All human knowledge", by Jimmy Wales (?)

2011-09-17 Thread Ray Saintonge
On 09/16/11 12:38 PM, Robert Rohde wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:01 PM, emijrp wrote: >> I think that the phrase meaning refered to Wikipedia is "the sum of all >> human knowledge which is notable and encyclopedic". >> >> Not ALL, ALL, ALL human knowledge. MySpace discarded. > When you look

Re: [Foundation-l] "All human knowledge", by Jimmy Wales (?)

2011-09-17 Thread Thomas Morton
On 17 Sep 2011, at 09:41, Ray Saintonge wrote: > On 09/16/11 12:38 PM, Robert Rohde wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:01 PM, emijrp wrote: >>> I think that the phrase meaning refered to Wikipedia is "the sum of all >>> human knowledge which is notable and encyclopedic". >>> >>> Not ALL, ALL,