On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Andrew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
> wrote:
>> Too bad Wikimedia TOS still labors under the misapprehension that the
>> licence doesn't mean what it says.
>
> Can you be specific, to make this into actionable feedback?
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
wrote:
> Too bad Wikimedia TOS still labors under the misapprehension that the
> licence doesn't mean what it says.
Can you be specific, to make this into actionable feedback?
--
Andrew Garrett
Wikimedia Foundation
agarr...@wikimedia.org
OBJECTION! Not enough Phoenix Wright references! :p
Indeed people often are discouraged from uploading images with a free
license over fears of attribution. This is a nice step in the right
direction. Congratulations!
-- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko)
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 22:18, David Gerard
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:31 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 15 September 2011 23:22, Chris Keating wrote:
>
>> The judgement is a preliminary injunction prior to a hearing. Presumably the
>> respondents will present a case at the hearing - do we know if they will
>> present arguments that the CC-By
On 15 September 2011 23:22, Chris Keating wrote:
> The judgement is a preliminary injunction prior to a hearing. Presumably the
> respondents will present a case at the hearing - do we know if they will
> present arguments that the CC-By-SA license is somehow unenforceable?
> However, the descrip
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:18 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/28644
>
> FLAWLESS VICTORY! [*]
>
>
>
Well done to Nina Gerlach, Till Jaeger and the others involved n the process
for the success so far (I remember Matthias talking about the possibilitiy
of proceedin
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/28644
FLAWLESS VICTORY! [*]
- d.
[*] I expect Geni to be along in a moment picking holes in this statement.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.
