Re: [Foundation-l] Collapsed galleries for particularly explicit images

Call me an optimist -- I retain the hope that such discussions may not remain circular forever, but eventually might come to resemble a spiral, with some upwards movement, as has happened in other areas like BLP. In discussions around these issues, it is easy for people on both sides of the a

Re: [Foundation-l] Collapsed galleries for particularly explicit images

On 10 June 2010 17:54, Excirial wrote: > This has been discussed many times on many occasions. It comes up every year or two, in accordance with the typical 18-24 month cycle of Wikipedia contribution. The discussion is pretty much the same every time. - d. __

Re: [Foundation-l] Collapsed galleries for particularly explicit images

This has been discussed many times on many occasions. See the extensive archives of depictions of muhammedand the long discussion regarding the images on the goatse.sxhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2010_March_29#Fi

[Foundation-l] Collapsed galleries for particularly explicit images

There is currently a discussion at the en:WP content noticeboard whether we could or should 1. Use collapsed galleries for particularly graphic sexual images (requiring the reader to click "Show" to see the content) 2. Display them openly, as has been normal practice so far 3. Dispense with im