On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Nathan wrote:
> I see Brandon replied to this thread several times; did anyone notice
> if the question in the OP (if community consensus is required for
> implementation, where was it demonstrated for en.wp) was answered?
As a matter of general practice, the Wiki
Hi Erik,
Thanks for explaining WMF's position with respect to not needing
community consensus, that is much clearer to me now. I am glad to see
mutual trust mentioned.
Cheers,
Fae
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscri
Erik Moeller wrote:
> As a matter of general practice, the Wikimedia Foundation aims to be
> responsive to the community both before and after the deployment of
> software, but it doesn't obtain community consensus before deploying
> software which it would like to deploy on its sites and services
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Nathan wrote:
>> I see Brandon replied to this thread several times; did anyone notice
>> if the question in the OP (if community consensus is required for
>> implementation, where was it demonstrated for en.w
On 10/31/2011 11:04 AM, David Levy wrote:
> Erik Moeller wrote:
>> As a matter of general practice, the Wikimedia Foundation aims to be
>> responsive to the community both before and after the deployment of
>> software, but it doesn't obtain community consensus before deploying
>> software which it
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Michael Snow wrote:
> If I understand correctly, the English Wikipedia is the main test
> deployment for this as an experimental feature. While the feature
> remains experimental, additional deployments to other wikis would only
> happen if requested by community
On 10/31/11 11:08 AM, Nathan wrote:
> It sounds like Brandon misunderstood the
> criteria for deploying WikiLove on various projects. Can you give us
> the correct description of how that is being handled?
Well. I wrote the criteria for additional deployment.
You can read them
Brandon Harris wrote:
> Well. I wrote the criteria for additional deployment.
In your earlier message, you omitted the word "additional" (and an
explanation of the preceding English Wikipedia test deployment).
No matter; the misunderstanding has been resolved.
David Levy
_
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Nathan wrote:
> That's a pretty bold statement for the WMF to make - "If you don't
> trust the WMF, don't contribute to WMF projects." Are you sure that's
> what you meant?
Hi Nathan,
let me try to clarify what I mean by trust in this context. We can,
indeed mus
Am 31.10.2011 18:34, schrieb Erik Moeller:
>
> The partnership between WMF and the community is founded on mutual
> trust. If you don't trust WMF, you can - and probably should -
> contribute your effort elsewhere, because WMF may - and probably will
> - do things you won't like.
>
> HTH,
> Er
Erik Moeller wrote:
> It's easy for us to accidentally send mixed messages, though, as this
> thread has shown. Because so many things are done in response to
> community consensus, there may be an expectation that this is always
> the case, and that that's just how we work.
In this instance, the
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 19:36, Erik Moeller wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Michael Snow wrote:
>> If I understand correctly, the English Wikipedia is the main test
>> deployment for this as an experimental feature. While the feature
>> remains experimental, additional deployments to o
12 matches
Mail list logo
