Hoi,
The study was commissioned by the WMF itself. Therefore there is an interest
in the results of the study.
As far as I am concerned, this is discussion has been very much an echo
chamber. The same points of view repeated by the same people. With very few
people actually listening and willing
It is possible that there is a difference between what the WMF is
interested in and what the community is interested in, something which
makes itself evident when there is no responses from people in the
various projects. . I'm aware there are various portions of the
community, but I can only
Hoi,
Given that this is the FOUNDATION-L it is quite relevant what the WMF is
interested in. If I were particularly interested in the English language
communities opinion I would be elsewhere.
As I argued before, I find this a subject that has been talked to death with
hardly a person interested
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:17 AM, David Goodman dgoodma...@gmail.com wrote:
It is possible that there is a difference between what the WMF is
interested in and what the community is interested in, something which
makes itself evident when there is no responses from people in the
various
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:49 PM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:17 AM, David Goodman dgoodma...@gmail.com wrote:
It is possible that there is a difference between what the WMF is
interested in and what the community is interested in, something which
makes
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 02:52, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
or winter! I vowed some time ago to not be northern-hemisphere-ist,
but I still slip up. Hard to think about it being winter elsewhere
when it's 39C outside here
But, you are using C instead of F, which is quite good
Milos Rancic wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 02:52, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
or winter! I vowed some time ago to not be northern-hemisphere-ist,
but I still slip up. Hard to think about it being winter elsewhere
when it's 39C outside here
But, you are using C
Robert,
For what it's worth and for the record, I want to thank you for
sharing your thoughts and findings about this process on this list,
it's a fantastic positive and constructive example of transparency
as I understand and value it.
Bon courage,
Cheers,
Delphine
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at
One serious issue with the current status of the study is that it appears to
be fairly death - especially when considering that it debates a
controversial issue while potentially not affecting just one, but every
single Wikipedia. After an initial and sustained burst which saw at least
several
If nobody is interested in discussing the study, the apparent
conclusion is not that the study should move to the next phase, but
just the opposite, that it should be abandoned. If nobody cares enough
to talk about it, it's not worth doing. (a slightly different
application of WP:GNG, the general
Robert Harris here again, the consultant looking at the
issues surrounding controversial content on Wikimedia projects. I wanted first
of all to thank all of you who have taken the trouble to once again weigh in on
a subject I know has been debated many times within the Wikimedia
11 matches
Mail list logo
